Title page from A dialogue on the principles of the constitution and legal liberty, compared with despotism; applied to the American question; and the Probable Events of the War, with observations on some important law authorities.

A dialogue on the principles of the constitution and legal liberty, compared with despotism; applied to the American question; and the Probable Events of the War, with observations on some important law authorities.

This piece depicts a fictional exchange between a representative of imperial administration, Aristocraticus, and a defender of America, Philodemus, making the case for colonial self-government. The example of Ireland plays a prominent role as proving the lack of any necessity for a single, unitary imposition of authority. And to the extent that Englishmen residing in England are not themselves represented in Parliament, this shows only that “the representation is defective, unjust.”

Show more

The text of these 18th century pamphlets has been converted by machine from scanned PDFs of the original microfilm copies. While the text has been machine-proofed, transcription errors may still remain. For example, the 18th-century long S, ſ , may be rendered as “f,” some words may be incorrectly transcribed, and there may be repeated words or phrases.