Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow Note on the Texts - The American Republic: Primary Sources

Return to Title Page for The American Republic: Primary Sources

Note on the Texts - Bruce Frohnen, The American Republic: Primary Sources [2002]

Edition used:

The American Republic: Primary Sources, ed. Bruce Frohnen (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002).

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


Note on the Texts

The editor has sought to make only a bare minimum of changes to the textsincluded in this volume, so as to convey the flavor as well as content of thewritings. Changes are limited to the following: The use of asterisks to markdeleted text has been replaced with the use of ellipses. Asterisks insertedwithout clear meaning or intent have been deleted, as have marginalia,extraneous quotation marks, and page numbers from previous editions that hadbeen inserted in various texts. The letters “f” and “s”have been properly distinguished. Some of the longer titles have been shortenedin accordance with modern usage. Headings in which the original text usedanachronistic fonts or, for example, all capital letters, have been modernizedand standardized.

The work of preceding editors in modernizing punctuation and spelling hasnot been tampered with. The editors of these previous volumes all expressed adesire to maintain strict fidelity to the original text and therebyincorporated only such minor modernizations in spelling, grammar, andpunctuation as were absolutely necessary to promote readability andconsistency. Those readers seeking specifics on such issues may find them inthe relevant source volumes in the bibliography.

The principal issue of concern to the lay reader will be the inclusion ofmaterial in brackets. Such brackets denote material filled in by the editor,material questionable as to its true authorship, or in some instances textmissing from the original.

Only those footnotes deemed necessary for understanding of the text havebeen reproduced here. However, in some instances (e.g., selections fromDickinson, Boucher, Noah Webster, and Story) footnotes are integral to thetext, and in others explanatory notes are necessary. Footnotes of earliereditors are marked “Ed.” and those few footnotes added by thecurrent editor are marked “B. F.”

In reproducing the fifth Lincoln-Douglas debate it was necessary tostandardize fonts and to eliminate headings and subheadings inserted by theprevious editors.