Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAPTER THIRTY–ONE. - Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John, with an Historical Introduction

Return to Title Page for Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John, with an Historical Introduction

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Collection: Goodrich Seminar Room
Subject Area: Law
Collection: Classics of Liberty

CHAPTER THIRTY–ONE. - William Sharp McKechnie, Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John, with an Historical Introduction [1215]

Edition used:

Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John, with an Historical Introduction, by William Sharp McKechnie (Glasgow: Maclehose, 1914).

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAPTER THIRTY–ONE.

Nec nos nec ballivi nostri capiemus alienum boscum ad castra, vel alia agenda nostra, nisi per voluntatem ipsius cujus boscus ille fuerit.

Neither we nor our bailiffs shall take, for our castles or for any other work of ours, wood which is not ours, against the will of the owner of that wood.

Purveyance of timber growing elsewhere than on royal manors is here prohibited in absolute terms. In marked contrast with the limited restrictions placed upon other branches of purveyance, this branch is taken away, not merely from local officials, but from the King himself.1 There was an obvious reason for greater stringency in this case: the King’s own extensive demesne woods furnished timber in abundance, whether for building purposes or for firewood, leaving him no excuse for taking, especially if for nothing, the trees of other people.

The purveyors of James I., shortly after his accession, transgressed this provision of Magna Carta by requisitioning timber for repairing the fortifications of Calais. A decision against the Crown was given by the Barons of Exchequer in the second year of James’s reign, and a proclamation was issued, bearing date 23rd April, 1607, disclaiming any right to such a prerogative. The guilty purveyors were brought before the Star Chamber.2

[1 ]Cf. Sir James Ramsay, Angevin Empire, p. 476, who considers that chapters 28 and 30, in the branches of prerogative with which they respectively deal, “leave the king’s personal right open.”

[2 ]See Coke, Second Institute, 36.