The English radical William Cobbett (1763-1835) did not believe that the British taxpayer should bail out those who had lent money to the British government which had been so profligate in its spending during the wars against Napoleon:
These conferences will not, I trust, as some persons appear to suppose, lead to any application of the public money, that is to say, of the taxes, to the assisting, as it is called, of these Loan-holders. The Loan-holders, or Loan-makers, have never been known to return to the people any part of the immense profits, which they, from time to time, have made upon their loaning transactions. We see, from one of the above-quoted passages, that Sir Francis Baring has gained enough to lay out half a million of money in freehold estates. Great part of this was, it is reasonable to suppose, gained by the many loans to government, in which he has been at different times concerned. Well, then, if these profits, these immense gains, be considered as fairly belonging to him, or his heirs and successors; and, if we view the not less immense gains of Goldsmidt in the same light; if the gains be theirs, ought not the loss to be theirs also? Upon any other principle, what a sort of bargain would a government loan be? A bargain where all the chance of gain would be on one side, and all the chance of loss on the other.
About this Quotation:
Cobbett was a vehement critic of the British government’s costly war against Napoleon because it introduced what he called a “Paper-Money System” to fund the war. The Bank of England suspended payment of specie (gold) in 1797 and replaced it with a paper currency which depreciated in value. Cobbett realised that this depreciation harmed the ordinary working people of England who saw their wages steadily lose purchasing power. This caused greatest hardship among the labouring poor whom he championed in his writings. In this quotation he discusses the problem of repaying those who lent money to the government. The Loan-holders did not want to be paid back in paper money which had depreciated in value but wanted the government, that is the taxpayers, to repay the loans at the higher pre-devalued rate. Cobbett argued that only those who were forced to lend money to the state should be recompensed. All others should accept the risk that lending money to a profligate government entails. For further information see David Ricardo on the Bullion Controversy and James Gillray’s cartoons on war and taxes.