|
Adam Smith on the ridiculousness of romantic love (1759) |
Tuesday 14 February 2012 (St. Valentine's Day)
The passion appears to every body, but the man who feels it, entirely disproportioned
to the value of the object; and love, though it is pardoned in a certain age
because we know it is natural, is always laughed at, because we cannot enter
into it.
On this Saint Valentine’s Day I thought it would be enlightening to see what
some moral philosophers have had to say on the topic of romantic love. This
quotation from Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) is more amusing
than enlightening as Smith seems to be genuinely unable to “sympathize” with
one person’s romantic love for another. He says that a third party can understand
another person feeling pain or hunger because we have had those same feelings
ourselves, but when it comes to understanding why an individual feels love
for a SPECIFIC other person then this same third party (namely himself) is
mystified. Smith calls the feeling “disproportioned to the value of the object”,
“ridiculous”, and to be “laughed at” as something rather immature. He concludes,
rather uncharitably, “though a lover may be good company to his mistress, he
is so to nobody else.” Perhaps we would be better off reading some of Petrach’s
or Shakespeare’s poetry. </quote/357>
|