|
|
Front Page
|
August 23-28, 2009 - Adams on Nipping Arbitrary Power in the Bud |
|
John Adams on Nipping the Shoots
of Arbitrary Power in the Bud
(1774) |
|
|
|
In 1774 John
Adams (1735-1826) replied to a series of essays by Daniel
Leonard who defended the authority of the British Parliament over
the American colonies. His Novanglus letters had a powerful impact
in the colonies, especially his arguments about the limits of British
imperial authority which Adams wanted to "nip in the bud":
Obsta principiis, nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud, is the
only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people. When the
people give way, their deceivers, betrayers, and destroyers press upon
them so fast, that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature of the
encroachment upon the American constitution is such, as to grow every day
more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and faster every
hour. The revenue creates pensioners, and the pensioners urge for more
revenue. The people grow less steady, spirited, and virtuous, the seekers
more numerous and more corrupt, and every day increases the circles of
their dependents and expectants, until virtue, integrity, public spirit,
simplicity, and frugality, become the objects of ridicule and scorn, and
vanity, luxury, foppery, selfishness, meanness, and downright venality
swallow up the whole society.
[Other books on The American
Revolution and The
Debate between Patriots and Loyalists]
|
The full paragraph from which this quotation was taken can be be viewed below (front page quote in bold):
I ought to apologize for the immoderate length of this paper; but general
assertions are only to be confuted by an examination of particulars, which
necessarily fills up much space. I will trespass on the reader’s patience
only while I make one observation more upon the art, I had almost said chicanery,
of this writer.
He affirms that we are not united in this province, and that associations
are forming in several parts of the province. The association he means
has been laid before the public, and a very curious piece of legerdemain
it is. Is there any article acknowledging the authority of parliament,
the unlimited authority of parliament? Brigadier Ruggles himself, Massachusettensis
himself, could not have signed it if there had been, consistent with their
known declared opinions. They associate to stand by the king’s laws,
and this every whig will subscribe. But, after all, what a wretched fortune
has this association made in the world! The numbers who have signed it
would appear so inconsiderable, that I dare say the Brigadier will never
publish to the world their numbers or names. But, “has not Great
Britain been a nursing-mother to us?” Yes, and we have behaved as
nurse-children commonly do,—been very fond of her, and rewarded her
all along tenfold for all her care and expense in our nurture.
But “is not our distraction owing to parliament’s taking off
a shilling-duty on tea and imposing threepence, and is not this a more
unaccountable frenzy, more disgraceful to the annals of America, than the
witchcraft?”
Is the threepence upon tea our only grievance? Are we not in this province
deprived of the privilege of paying our governors, judges, &c.? Are
not trials by jury taken from us? Are we not sent to England for trial?
Is not a military government put over us? Is not our constitution demolished
to the foundation? Have not the ministry shown, by the Quebec bill, that
we have no security against them for our religion, any more than our property,
if we once submit to the unlimited claims of parliament? This is so gross
an attempt to impose on the most ignorant of the people, that it is a shame
to answer it.
Obsta principiis, nip the shoots of arbitrary power in the bud,
is the only maxim which can ever preserve the liberties of any people.
When the people give way, their deceivers, betrayers, and destroyers
press upon them so fast, that there is no resisting afterwards. The nature
of the encroachment upon the American constitution is such, as to grow
every day more and more encroaching. Like a cancer, it eats faster and
faster every hour. The revenue creates pensioners, and the pensioners
urge for more revenue. The people grow less steady, spirited, and virtuous,
the seekers more numerous and more corrupt, and every day increases the
circles of their dependents and expectants, until virtue, integrity,
public spirit, simplicity, and frugality, become the objects of ridicule
and scorn, and vanity, luxury, foppery, selfishness, meanness, and downright
venality swallow up the whole society.
|
|