Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAP. XVII.: A particular Circumstance in the Election of the Kings of the second Race. - Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws

Return to Title Page for Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws

Search this Title:

CHAP. XVII.: A particular Circumstance in the Election of the Kings of the second Race. - Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws [1748]

Edition used:

The Complete Works of M. de Montesquieu (London: T. Evans, 1777), 4 vols. Vol. 2.

Part of: Complete Works of Montesquieu, 4 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAP. XVII.

A particular Circumstance in the Election of the Kings of the second Race.

WE find by the formulary* of Pepin’s coronation, that Charles and Carloman were also anointed; and that the French nobility bound themselves, on pain of interdiction and excommunication, never to chuse a prince of another family.

It appears by the wills of Charlemaign and Lewis the Debonnaire, that the Franks made a choice among the king’s children; which agrees with the abovementioned clause. And when the empire was transferred from Charlemaign’s family, the election, which before had been conditional, became simple and absolute; so that the ancient constitution was altered.

Pepin perceiving himself near his end, assembled the lords both temporal and spiritual at St. Denis, and divided his kingdom between his two sons Charles and Carloman. We have not the acts of this assembly; but we find what was there transacted, in the author of the ancient historical collection, published by Canifius, and in the writer of the annals of Mentz, according to§ the observation of Baluzius. Here I meet with two things in some measure contradictory; that he made this division with the consent of the nobility, and afterwards that he made it by his paternal authority. This proves what I said, that the people’s right in the second race was to chuse in the same family; it was properly speaking, rather a right of exclusion, than that of election.

This kind of elective right is confirmed by the records of the second race. Such is this capitulary of the division of the empire made by Charlemaign among his three children, in which after settling their shares, he says* “That if one of the three brothers happens to have a son, such as the people shall be willing to chuse as a fit person to succeed to his father’s kingdom, his uncles shall consent to it.”

This same regulation is to be met with in the partition which Lewis the Debonnaire made among his three children, Pepin, Lewis, and Charles, in the year 837, at the assembly of Aix-la-Chapelle: and likewise in another partition, made twenty years before, by the same emperor, in favour of Lotharius, Pepin, and Lewis. We may likewise see the oath which Lewis the Stammerer took at Compeigne, at his coronation. “I Lewis, by the divine mercy, and the people’s election appointed king, do promise . . . . . What I say is confirmed by the acts of the council of Valence§ held in the year 890, for the election of Lewis, son of Boson, to the kingdom of Arles. Lewis was there elected, and the principal reason they give for chusing him, is, that he was of the imperial family* , that Charles the Fat had conferred upon him the dignity of king, and that the emperor Arnold had invested him by the sceptre, and by the ministry of his ambassadors. The kingdom of Arles, like the other dismembered or dependent kingdoms of Charlemaign, was elective and hereditary.

[* ]Vol. 5th of the historians of France by the Benedictins, page 9.

[]Ut numquam de alterius lumbis regem in ævo presumant eligere, sed ex ipsorum. Vol. 5th o the bistorians o France page 10.

[]In the year 768.

[]Tom. 2. lectionis antiquæ.

[§ ]Edition of the capitularies, tom. 1, page 188.

[* ]In the first capitulary of the year 806. Baluzius’s edition, page 439, art. 5.

[]In Goldast. Imperial. Constitut. tom. 2. page 19.

[]Baluzius’s edition, page 574. art. 14. Si vero aliquis illorum decedens legitimos filios reliqueret, non inter eos potestas ipsa dividatur, sed potius populus pariter conveniens, unum ex eis quem dominus voluerit eligat, et hunc senior frater in loco fratris et filii suscipiat.

[]Capitulary of the year 877. Baluzius’s edition, page 272.

[§ ]In father Labbe’s councils, tom. 9. col. 424. and in Dumont’s Corp. Diplomat. tom. 1. art. 36.

[* ]By the mother’s side.