Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAP. XXI.: Of the territorial Jurisdiction of the Churches. - Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws

Return to Title Page for Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws

Search this Title:

CHAP. XXI.: Of the territorial Jurisdiction of the Churches. - Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws [1748]

Edition used:

The Complete Works of M. de Montesquieu (London: T. Evans, 1777), 4 vols. Vol. 2.

Part of: Complete Works of Montesquieu, 4 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAP. XXI.

Of the territorial Jurisdiction of the Churches.

THE churches acquired a very considerable property. We find that our kings gave them great seignories, that is, great fiefs; and we find jurisdictions established at the same time in the demesnes of those churches. From whence could so extraordinary a privilege derive its origin? It must certainly have been in the nature of the grant: the church land had this privilege, because it had not been taken from it. A seignory was given to the church; and it was allowed to enjoy the same privileges, as if it had been granted to a vassal. It was also subjected to the same service as it would have paid to the state if it had been given to a layman, according to what we have already observed.

The churches had therefore the right of demanding the payment of compositions in their territory; and of insisting upon the fredum; and as those rights necessarily implied that of hindering the king’s officers from entering upon the territory, to demand these fréda and to exercise acts of judicature, the right which ecclesiastics had of administering justice in their own territory, was called immunity, in the style of the formularies* , of the charters, and of the capitularies.

The law of the Ripuarians forbids the freedmen of the churches, to hold the assembly for administering justice in any other place than in the church where they were manumitted. The churches had therefore jurisdictions even over freemen, and held their placita in the earliest times of the monarchy.

I find in the lives of the saints§ , that Clovis gave to a certain holy person a power over a district of six leagues, and exempted it from all manner of jurisdiction. This, I believe, is a falsity, but it is a falsity of a very ancient date; both the truth and the fiction contained in that life are relative to the customs and laws of those times, and it is these customs* and laws we are investigating.

Clotharius II. orders†† the bishops or the nobility who are possessed of estates in distant parts, to chuse upon the very spot those who are to administer justice, or to receive the judiciary emoluments.

The same prince‡‡ regulates the judiciary power between the ecclesiastic courts and his officers. The capitulary of Charlemaign in the year 802 prescribes to the bishops and abbots, the qualifications necessary for their officers of justice. Another capitulary∥∥ of the same prince inhibits the royal officers, to exercise any jurisdiction over§§ those who are employed in manuring church-lands, except they entered into that state by fraud, and to exempt themselves from contributing to the public charges. The bishops assembled at Rheims made a declaration* , that the vassals belonging to the respective churches are within their immunity. The capitulary of Charlemaign in the year 806 ordains that the churches should have both criminal and civil jurisdiction over those who live upon their lands. In fine, as the capitulary of Charles the Bald distinguishes between the king’s jurisdiction, that of the lords, and that of the church; I shall say nothing farther upon this subject.

[* ]See the 3d and 4th formulary of Marculsus, book 1.

[]Ne alibi nisi ad ecclesiam, ubi relaxati sunt, mallum teneant, tit. 58. sect. 1. See also sect. 19. Lindenbrock’s edition.

[]Tabulariis.

[]Mallum.

[§ ]Vita S. Germeri Episcopi Tolosani apud Bollandianos, 16 Maii.

[* ]See also the life of S. Melanius, and that of S. Deicola.

[†† ]In the council of Paris, in the year 615. Episcopi vel potentes, qui in aliis possident regionibus, judices vel missos discussores de aliis provinciis non instituant, nisi de loco qui justitiam percipiant & aliis reddant, art. 19. See also the 12th art.

[‡‡ ]Ibid. art. 5.

[∥∥ ]In the law of the Lombards, book ii. tit. 44. chap. 2. Lindenbrock’s edition.

[§§ ]Servi Aldiones, libellarii antiqui, vel alii noviter facti. Ibid.

[* ]Letter in the year 858. art. 7. in the capitularies, p. 108. Sieut illæ res et facultates, in quibus vivunt clerici, ita et illæ sub consecratione immunitatis sunt, de quibus debent militare vassalli.

[]It is added to the law of the Bavarians, art. 7. See also the 3d. art. Lindenbrock’s edition, page 444. Imprimis omnium jubendam est ut habeant ecclesiæ earum justitias, & in vita illorum qui habitant in ipsis ecclesiis & post, tam in pecuniis quam et in substantiis earum.

[]In the year 857. in synodo apud Carifiatum, art. 9. edition of Baluzius, page 96.

[]See the letter written by the bishops assembled at Rheims in the year 858. art. 7. in the capitularies, Baluzius’s edition, page 108. Sicut illæ res & facultates in quibus vivunt clerici, ita et illæ sub consecratione immunitatis sunt de quibus debent militare vassalli, &c.