Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAP. XV.: That what they called census was raised only on the bondmen, and not on the freemen. - Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws

Return to Title Page for Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws

Search this Title:

CHAP. XV.: That what they called census was raised only on the bondmen, and not on the freemen. - Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, Complete Works, vol. 2 The Spirit of Laws [1748]

Edition used:

The Complete Works of M. de Montesquieu (London: T. Evans, 1777), 4 vols. Vol. 2.

Part of: Complete Works of Montesquieu, 4 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAP. XV.

That what they called census was raised only on the bondmen, and not on the freemen.

THE king, the clergy, and the lords raised regular taxes, each on the bondmen of their respective demesnes. I prove it with respect to the king, by the capitulary de Villis; with regard to the clergy, by the codes of the* laws of the Barbarians; and with relation to the lords, by the regulations which Charlemaign made concerning this subject.

These taxes were called census; they were œconomical and not fiscal duties, mere private services and not public obligations.

I affirm, that what they called census at that time, was a tax raised upon the bondmen. This I prove by a formulary of Marculfus containing a permission from the king to enter into holy orders, provided the persons be* free-born, and not enrolled in the register of the census. I prove it also by a commission from Charlemaign to a count , whom he had sent into Saxony; which contains the infranchisement of the Saxons for having embraced Christianity, and is properly a charter of freedom . This prince restores them to their former§ civil liberty, and exempts them from paying the census. It was therefore the same thing to be a bondman as to pay the census, to be free as not to pay it.

By a kind of letters patent* of the same prince in favour of the Spaniards, who had been received into the monarchy, the counts are forbid to demand any census of them, or to deprive them of their lands. That strangers upon their coming to France were treated as bondmen, is a thing well known; and Charlemaign being desirous they should be considered as freemen, since he would have them be proprietors of their lands, forbade the demanding any census of them.

A capitulary of Charles the Bald , given in favour of those very Spaniards, orders them to be treated like the other Franks, and forbids the requiring any census of them: consequently this census was not paid by freemen.

The thirtieth article of the edict of Pistes reforms the abuse, by which several of the husbandmen belonging to the king or to the church, sold the lands dependent on their manors to ecclesiastics or to people of their condition, reserving only a small cottage to themselves; by which means they avoided paying the census; and, it ordains, that things should be restored to their primitive situation: the census was therefore a tax peculiar to bondmen.

From thence also it follows, that there was no general census in the monarchy; and this is clear from a great number of passages. For what could be the meaning of this capitulary? “We ordain that the royal census should be levied in all places, where formerly it was lawfully levied.” What could be the meaning of that in which Charlemaign orders his commissaries in the provinces to make an exact enquiry into all the census’s that belonged in former times to the king’s demesne? And of that§ in which he disposes of the census’s paid by those* of whom they are demanded? What can that other capitulary†† mean, in which we read, “If any person‡‡ has acquired a tributary land, on which we were accustomed to levy the census?” And that other in fine∥∥ , in which Charles the Bald§§ makes mention of the lands, whose census had from time immemorial belonged to the king.

Observe that there are some passages which seem at first sight to be contrary to what I have said, and yet confirm it. We have already seen that the freemen in the monarchy were obliged only to furnish particular carriages; the capitulary just now cited gives to this** the name of census, and opposes it to the census paid by the bondmen.

Besides, the edict††† of Pistes takes notice of those freemen who are obliged to pay the royal census for their head and for their cottages, and who had sold themselves during the famine. The king orders them to be ransomed. This is because those who were manumitted by the king’s letters, did not, generally speaking, acquire a full and perfect§ liberty, but they paid censum in capite; and these are the people here meant.

We must therefore explode the idea of a general and universal census, in imitation of that of the Romans, from which census the rights of the lords are also supposed to have been derived by usurpation. What was called census in the French monarchy, independently of the abuse made of that word, was a particular tax imposed on the bondmen by their masters.

I beg the reader to excuse the trouble I must give him with such a number of citations. I should be more concise, did I not meet with the Abbé du Bos’s book on the establishment of the French monarchy in Gaul, continually in my way. Nothing is a greater obstacle to our progress in knowledge, than a bad performance of a celebrated author; because, before we instruct, we must begin with undeceiving.

[* ]Law of the Alemans, chap. 22. and the law of the Bavarians, tit. 1. chap. 14. where the regulations are to be found which the clergy made concerning their order.

[]Book 5th of the Capitularies, chap. 303.

[* ]Si ille de capite suo bene ingenuus sit, et in Puletico publico censitus non est. Lib. 1. formul. 19.

[]In the year 789. edition of the Capitularies by Baluzius, vol. i. p. 250.

[]Et ut ista ingenuitatis pagina firma stabilisque consistat. Ibid.

[§ ]Pristinæque libertati donatos, & omni nobis debito censu solutos. Ibid.

[* ]Præceptum pro Hispanis, in the year 812. edition of Baluzius, tom. i. page 500.

[]In the year 844. edition of Baluzius, tom. ii. art. 1 and 2. page 17.

[]Third capitulary of the year 805. art. 20 and 23. inserted in the collection of Anzegise, book iii. art. 15. This is agreeable to that of Charles the Bald, in the year 854. apud Attiniacum, art. 6.

[]Undecunque legitime exigebatur. Ibid.

[]In the year 812. art. 10. & 11. edition of Baluzius, tom. 1. page 398.

[]Undecunque antiquitus ad partem regis venire solebant. Capitulary of the year 812, art. 10. & 11.

[§ ]In the year 813. art. 6. edition of Baluxius, tom. i. page 508.

[* ]De illis unde censa exigunt. Capitulary of the year 813. art. 6.

[†† ]Book 4. of the Capitularies, art. 37. and inserted in the law of the Lombards.

[‡‡ ]Si quis terram tributariam, unde census ad partem nostram exire solebat, susceperit. Book 4. of the Capitularies, art. 37.

[∥∥ ]In the year 805. art. 8.

[§§ ]Unde census ad partem regis exivit antiquitus. Capitulary of the year 805. art. 8.

[** ]Censibus vel paraveredis quos Franci homines ad regiam potestatem exsolvere debent.

[††† ]In the year 864. art. 34. edition of Baluzius, page 192.

[]De illis francis hominibus qui censum regium de suo capite & de suis recellis debeant. Ibid.

[]The 28th article of the same edict explains this extremely well; it even makes a distinction between a Roman freedman and a Frank freedman: And we likewise see there that the census was not general: it deserves to be read.

[§ ]As appears by the capitulary of Charlemaign in the year 813, which we have already quoted.