- The Spirit of Laws.
- Book XX.: Of Laws In Relation to Commerce, Considered In Its Nature and Distinctions.
- Chap. I.: Of Commerce.
- Chap. II.: Of the Spirit of Commerce.
- Chap. III.: Of the Poverty of the People.
- Chap. IV.: Of Commerce In Different Governments.
- Chap. V.: Of Nations That Have Entered Into an œconomical Commerce.
- Chap. VI.: Some Effects of an Extensive Navigation.
- Chap. VII.: The Spirit of England, With Respect to Commerce.
- Chap. VIII.: In What Manner the œconomical Commerce Has Been Sometimes Restrained.
- Chap. IX.: Of the Prohibition of Commerce.
- Chap. X.: An Institution Adapted to œconomical Commerce.
- Chap. XI.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XII.: Of the Freedom of Commerce.
- Chap. XIII.: What It Is That Destroys This Liberty.
- Chap. XIV.: The Laws of Commerce Concerning the Confiscation of Merchandises.
- Chap. XV.: Of Seizing the Persons of Merchants.
- Chap. XVI.: An Excellent Law.
- Chap. XVII.: A Law of Rhodes.
- Chap. XVIII.: Of the Judges of Commerce.
- Chap. XIX.: That a Prince Ought Not to Engage Himself In Commerce.
- Chap. XX.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXI.: Of the Commerce of the Nobility In a Monarchy.
- Chap. XXII.: A Singular Reflection.
- Chap. XXIII.: To What Nations Commerce Is Prejudicial.
- Book XXI.: Of Laws Relative to Commerce, Considered In the Revolutions It Has Met With In the World.
- Chap. I.: Some General Considerations.
- Chap. II.: Of the People of Africa.
- Chap. III.: That the Wants of the People In the South Are Different From Those of the North.
- Chap. IV.: The Principal Difference Between the Commerce of the Ancients and the Moderns.
- Chap. V.: Other Differences.
- Chap. VI.: Of the Commerce of the Ancients.
- Chap. VII.: Of the Commerce of the Greeks.
- Chap. VIII.: Of Alexander. His Conquest.
- Chap. IX.: Of the Commerce of the Grecian Kings After the Death of Alexander.
- Chap. X.: Of the Circuit of Africa.
- Chap. XI.: Of Carthage and Marseilles.
- Chap. XII.: The Isle of Delos. Mithridates.
- Chap. XIII.: Of the Genius of the Romans As to Maritime Affairs.
- Chap. XIV.: Of the Genius of the Romans With Respect to Commerce.
- Chap. XV.: Of the Commerce of the Romans With the Barbarians.
- Chap. XVI.: Of the Commerce of the Romans With Arabia, and the Indies.
- Chap. XVII.: Of Commerce After the Destruction of the Western Empire.
- Chap. XVIII.: A Particular Regulation.
- Chap. XIX.: Of Commerce After the Decay of the Roman Power In the East.
- Chap. XX.: How Commerce Broke Through the Barbarism of Europe.
- Chap. XXI.: The Discovery of Two New Worlds, and In What Manner Europe Is Affected By It.
- Chap. XXII.: Of the Riches Which Spain Drew From America.
- Chap. XXIII.: A Problem.
- Book XXII.: Of Laws In Relation to the Use of Money.
- Chap. I.: The Reason of the Use of Money.
- Chap. II.: Of the Nature of Money.
- Chap. III.: Of Ideal Money.
- Chap. IV.: Of the Quantity of Gold and Silver.
- Chap. V.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. VI.: The Reason Why Interest Was Lowered One Half After the Conquest of the Indies.
- Chap. VII.: How the Price of Things Is Fixed In the Variation of the Sign of Riches.
- Chap. VIII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. IX.: Of the Relative Scarcity of Gold and Silver.
- Chap. X.: Of Exchange.
- Chap. XI.: Of the Proceedings of the Romans With Respect to Money.
- Chap. XII.: The Circumstances In Which the Romans Changed the Value of Their Specie.
- Chap. XIII.: Proceedings With Respect to Money In the Time of the Emperors.
- Chap. XIV.: How the Exchange Is a Constraint On Despotic Power.
- Chap. XV.: The Practice of Some Countries In Italy
- Chap. XVI.: The Assistance a State May Derive From Bankers.
- Chap. XVII.: Of Public Debts.
- Chap. XVIII.: Of the Payment of Public Debts.
- Chap. XIX.: Of Lending Upon Interest.
- Chap. XX.: Of Maritime Usury.
- Chap. XXI.: Of Lending By Contract, and the State of Usury Amongst the Romans.
- Chap. XXII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Book XXIII.: Of Laws In the Relation They Bear to the Number of Inhabitants.
- Chap. I.: Of Men and Animals, With Respect to Multiplication of Their Species.
- Chap. II.: Of Marriage.
- Chap. III.: Of the Condition of Children.
- Chap. IV.: Of Families.
- Chap. V.: Of the Several Orders of Lawful Wives.
- Chap. VI.: Of Bastards In Different Governments.
- Chap. VII.: Of the Father’s Consent to Marriage.
- Chap. VIII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. IX.: Of Young Women.
- Chap. X.: What It Is That Determines to Marriage.
- Chap. XI.: Of the Severity of Government.
- Chap. XII.: Of the Number of Males and Females In Different Countries.
- Chap. XIII.: Of Sea-port Towns.
- Chap. XIV.: Of the Productions of the Earth Which Require a Greater Or Less Number of Men.
- Chap. XV.: Of the Number of Inhabitants With Relation to the Arts.
- Chap. XVI.: The Concern of the Legislator In the Propagation of the Species.
- Chap. XVII.: Of Greece, and the Number of Its Inhabitants.
- Chap. XVIII.: Of the State and Number of People Before the Romans.
- Chap. XIX.: Of the Depopulation of the Globe.
- Chap. XX.: That the Romans Were Under a Necessity of Making Laws, to Encourage the Propagation of the Species.
- Chap. XXI.: Of the Laws of the Romans Relating to the Propagation of the Species.
- Chap. XXII.: Of the Exposing of Children.
- Chap. XXIII.: Of the State of the World After the Destruction of the Romans.
- Chap. XXIV.: The Changes Which Happened In Europe, With Regard to the Number of the Inhabitants.
- Chap. XXV.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXVI.: Consequences.
- Chap. XXVII.: Of the Law Made In France to Encourage the Propagation of the Species.
- Chap. XXVIII.: By What Means We May Remedy a Depopulation.
- Chap. XXIX.: Of Hospitals.
- Book XXIV.: Of Laws As Relative to Religion, Considered In Itself, and In Its Doctrines.
- Chap. I.: Of Religion In General.
- Chap. II.: A Paradox of Mr. Bayle’s.
- Chap. III.: That a Moderate Government Is Most Agreeable to the Christian Religion, and a Despotic Government to the Mahometan.
- Chap. IV.: Consequences From the Character of the Christian Religion, and That of the Mahometan.
- Chap. V.: That the Catholic Religion Is Most Agreeable to a Monarchy, and the Protestant to a Republic.
- Chap. VI.: Another of Mr. Bayle’s Paradoxes.
- Chap. VII.: Of the Laws of Perfection In Religion.
- Chap. VIII.: Of the Connection Between the Moral Laws and Those of Religion.
- Chap. IX.: Of the Essenes.
- Chap. X.: Of the Sect of Stoics.
- Chap. XI.: Of Contemplation.
- Chap. XII.: Of Penances.
- Chap. XIII.: Of Inexpiable Crimes.
- Chap. XIV.: In What Manner Religion Has an Influence On Civil Laws.
- Chap. XV.: How False Religious Are Sometimes Corrected By the Civil Laws.
- Chap. XVI.: How the Laws of Religion Correct the Inconveniencies of a Political Constitution.
- Chap. XVII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XVIII.: How the Laws of Religion Have the Effect of Civil Laws.
- Chap. XIX.: That It Is Not So Much the Truth Or Falsity of a Doctrine Which Renders It Useful Or Pernicious to Men In Civil Government, As the Use Or Abuse of It.
- Chap. XX.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXI.: Of the Metempsychosis.
- Chap. XXII.: That It Is Dangerous For Religion to Inspire an Aversion For Things In Themselves Indifferent.
- Chap. XXIII.: Of Festivals.
- Chap. XXIV.: Of the Local Laws of Religion.
- Chap. XXV.: The Inconveniency of Transplanting a Religion From One Country to Another.
- Chap. XXVI.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Book XXV.: Of Laws As Relative to the Establishment of Religion and Its External Polity.
- Chap. I.: Of Religious Sentiments.
- Chap. II.: Of the Motives of Attachment to Different Religions.
- Chap. III.: Of Temples.
- Chap. IV.: Of the Ministers of Religion.
- Chap. V.: Of the Bounds Which the Laws Ought to Prescribe to the Riches of the Clergy.
- Chap. VI.: Of Monasteries.
- Chap. VII.: Of the Luxury of Superstition.
- Chap. VIII.: Of the Pontificate.
- Chap. IX.: Of Toleration In Point of Religion.
- Chap. X.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XI.: Of Changing a Religion.
- Chap. XII.: Of Penal Laws.
- Chap. XIII.: A Most Humble Remonstrance to the Inquisitors of Spain and Portugal.
- Chap. XIV.: Why the Christian Religion Is So Odious In Japan.
- Chap. XV.: Of the Propagation of Religion.
- Book XXVI.: Of Laws, As Relative to the Order of Things On Which They Determine.
- Chap. I.: Idea of This Book.
- Chap II.: Of Laws Divine and Human.
- Chap. III.: Of Civil Laws Contrary to the Law of Nature.
- Chap. IV.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. V.: Cases In Which We May Judge By the Principles of the Civil Law, In Limiting the Principles of the Law of Nature.
- Chap. VI.: That the Order of Succession Or Inheritance Depends On the Principles of Political Or Civil Law, and Not On Those of the Law of Nature.
- Chap. VII.: That We Ought Not to Decide By the Precepts of Religion, What Belongs Only to the Law of Nature.
- Chap. VIII.: That We Ought Not to Regulate By the Principles of the Canon Law, Things Which Should Be Regulated By Those of the Civil Law.
- Chap. IX.: That Things Which Ought to Be Regulated By the Principles of Civil Law, Can Seldom Be Regulated By Those of Religion.
- Chap. X.: In What Case We Ought to Follow the Civil Law Which Permits, and Not the Law of Religion Which Forbids.
- Chap. XI.: That Human Courts of Justice Should Not Be Regulated By the Maxims of Those Tribunals Which Relate to the Other Life.
- Chap. XII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XIII.: In What Cases, With Regard to Marriage, We Ought to Follow the Laws of Religion; and In What Cases We Should Follow the Civil Laws.
- Chap. XIV.: In What Instances Marriages Between Relations Should Be Regulated By the Laws of Nature; and In What Instances By the Civil Laws.
- Chap. XV.: That We Should Not Regulate By the Principles of Political Law, Those Things Which Depend On the Principles of Civil Law.
- Chap. XVI.: That We Ought Not to Decide By the Rules of the Civil Law, When It Is Proper to Decide By Those of the Political Law.
- Chap. XVII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XVIII.: That It Is Necessary to Enquire, Whether the Laws Which Seem Contradictory, Are of the Same Class.
- Chap. XIX.: That We Should Not Decide Those Things By the Civil Law, Which Ought to Be Decided By Domestic Laws.
- Chap. XX.: That We Ought Not to Decide By the Principles of the Civil Law, Those Things Which Belong to the Law of Nations.
- Chap. XXI.: That We Should Not Decide By Political Laws, Things Which Belong to the Law of Nations.
- Chap. XXII.: The Unhappy State of the Ynca Athualpa.
- Chap. XXIII.: That When, By Some Circumstance, the Political Law Becomes Destructive to the State, We Ought to Decide By Such a Political Law As Will Preserve It, Which Sometimes Becomes a Law of Nations.
- Chap. XXIV.: That the Regulations of the Police Are of a Different Class From Other Civil Laws.
- Chap. XXV.: That We Should Not Follow the General Disposition of the Civil Law, In Things Which Ought to Be Subject to Particular Rules Drawn From Their Own Nature.
- Book XXVII.: Of the Origin and Revolutions of the Roman Laws On Successions.
- Chap. I.
- Book XXVIII. Of the Origin and Revolutions of the Civil Laws Among the French.
- Chap. I.: Different Character of the Laws of the Several People of Germany.
- Chap. II.: That the Laws of the Barbarians Were All Personal.
- Chap. III.: Capital Difference Between the Salic Laws and Those of the Visigoths and Burgundians.
- Chap. IV.: In What Manner the Roman Law Came to Be Lost In the Country Subject to the Franks, and Preserved In That Subject to the Goths and Burgundians.
- Chap. V.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. VI.: How the Roman Law Kept Its Ground In the Demesne of the Lombards.
- Chap. VII.: How the Roman Law Came to Be Lost In Spain.
- Chap. VIII.: A False Capitulary.
- Chap. IX.: In What Manner the Codes of Barbarian Laws, and the Capitularies Came to Be Lost.
- Chap. X.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XI.: Other Causes of the Disuse of the Codes of Barbarian Laws, As Well As of the Roman Law, and of the Capitularies.
- Chap. XII.: Of Local Customs. Revolution of the Laws of Barbarous Nations, As Well As of the Roman Law.
- Chap. XIII.: Difference Between the Salic Law, Or That of the Salian Franks, and That of the Ripuarian Franks, and Other Barbarous Nations.
- Chap. XIV.: Another Difference.
- Chap. XV.: A Reflection.
- Chap. XVI.: Of the Ordeal, Or Trial By Boiling Water, Established By the Salic Law.
- Chap. XVII.: Particular Notions of Our Ancestors.
- Chap. XVIII.: In What Manner the Custom of Judicial Combats Gained Ground.
- Chap. XIX.: A New Reason of the Disuse of the Salic and Roman Laws, As Also of the Capitularies.
- Chap. XX.: Origin of the Point of Honour.
- Chap. XXI.: A New Reflection Upon the Point of Honour Among the Germans.
- Chap. XXII.: Of the Manners Relative to Judicial Combats.
- Chap. XXIII.: Of the Code of Laws On Judicial Combats.
- Chap. XXIV.: Rules Established In the Judicial Combat.
- Chap. XXV.: Of the Bounds Prescribed to the Custom of Judicial Combats.
- Chap. XXVI.: Of the Judiciary Combat Between One of the Parties, and One of the Witnesses.
- Chap. XXVII.: Of the Judicial Combat Between One of the Parties, and One of the Lord’s Peers. Appeal of False Judgment.
- Chap. XXVIII.: Of the Appeal of Default of Justice.
- Chap. XXIX.: Epoch of the Reign of St. Lewis.
- Chap. XXX.: Observations On Appeals.
- Chap. XXXI.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXXII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXXIII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXXIV.: In What Manner the Proceedings At Law Became Secret.
- Chap. XXXV.: Of the Costs.
- Chap. XXXVI.: Of the Public Prosecutor.
- Chap. XXXVII.: In What Manner the Institutions of St. Lewis Fell Into Oblivion.
- Chap. XXXVIII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXXIX.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. Xl.: In What Manner the Judiciary Forms Were Borrowed From the Decretals.
- Chap. Xli.: Fiux and Reflux of the Ecclesiastic and Temporal Jurisdiction.
- Chap. Xlii.: the Revival of the Roman Law, and the Result Thereof. Change In the Tribunals.
- Chap. Xliii.: the Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. Xliv.: of the Proof By Witnesses.
- Chap. Xlv.: of the Customs of France.
- Book XXIX.: Of the Manner of Composing Laws.
- Chap. I.: Of the Spirit of a Legislator.
- Chap. II.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. III.: That the Laws Which Seem to Deviate From the Views of the Legislator, Are Frequently Agreeable to Them.
- Chap. IV.: Of the Laws Contrary to the Views of the Legislator.
- Chap. V.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. VI.: That Laws Which Appear the Same, Have Not Always the Same Effect.
- Chap. VII.: The Same Subject Continued. Necessity of Composing Laws In a Proper Manner.
- Chap. VIII.: That Laws Which Appear the Same, Were Not Always Made Through the Same Motive.
- Chap. IX.: That the Greek and Roman Laws Punished Suicide, But Not Through the Same Motive.
- Chap. X.: That Laws Which Seem Contrary, Proceed Sometimes From the Same Spirit.
- Chap. XI.: How We Are to Judge of the Difference of Laws.
- Chap. XII.: That Laws Which Appear the Same, Are Sometimes Really Different.
- Chap. XIII.: That We Must Not Separate Laws From the End For Which They Were Made. of the Roman Laws On Theft.
- Chap. XIV.: That We Must Not Separate the Laws From the Circumstances In Which They Were Made.
- Chap. XV.: That Sometimes It Is Proper the Law Should Amend Itself.
- Chap. XVI.: Things to Be Observed In the Composing of Laws.
- Chap. XVII.: A Bad Method of Giving Laws.
- Chap. XVIII.: Of the Ideas of Uniformity.
- Chap. XIX.: Of Legislators.
- Book XXX.: Theory of the Feudal Laws Among the Franks, In the Relation They Bear to the Establishment of the Monarchy.
- Chap. I.: Of Feudal Laws.
- Chap. II.: Of the Source of Feudal Laws.
- Chap. III.: The Origin of Vassalage.
- Chap. IV.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. V.: Of the Conquests of the Franks.
- Chap. VI.: Of the Goths, Burgundians, and Franks.
- Chap. VII.: Different Ways of Dividing the Land.
- Chap. VIII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. IX.: A Just Application of the Law of the Burgundians and of That of the Visigoths In Relation to the Division of Lands.
- Chap. X.: Of Servitudes.
- Chap. XI.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XII.: That the Lands Belonging to the Division of the Barbarians Paid No Taxes.
- Chap. XIII.: Of Taxes Paid By the Romans and Gauls, In the Monarchy of the Franks.
- Chap. XIV.: Of What They Called Census.
- Chap. XV.: That What They Called Census Was Raised Only On the Bondmen, and Not On the Freemen.
- Chap. XVI.: Of the Feudal Lords Or Vassals.
- Chap. XVII.: Of the Military Service of Freemen.
- Chap. XVIII.: Of the Double Service.
- Chap. XIX.: Of Compositions Among the Barbarous Nations.
- Chap. XX.: Of What Was Afterwards Called the Jurisdiction of the Lords.
- Chap. XXI.: Of the Territorial Jurisdiction of the Churches.
- Chap. XXII.: That the Jurisdictions Were Established Before the End of the Second Race.
- Chap. XXIII.: General Idea of the Abbé Du Bos’ S Book On the Establishment of the French Monarchy In Gaul.
- Chap. XXIV.: The Same Subject Continued. Reflection On the Main Part of the System.
- Chap. XXV.: Of the French Nobility.
- Book XXXI.: Theory of the Feudal Laws Among the Franks, In the Relation They Bear to the Revolutions of Their Monarchy.
- Chap. I.: Changes In the Offices and In the Fiefs. of the Mayors of the Palace.
- Chap. II.: How the Civil Government Was Reformed.
- Chap. III.: Authority of the Mayors of the Palace.
- Chap. IV.: Of the Genius of the Nation In Regard to the Mayors.
- Chap. V.: In What Manner the Mayors Obtained the Command of the Armies.
- Chap. VI.: Second Epocha of the Humiliation of Our Kings of the First Race.
- Chap. VII.: Of the Great Offices and Fiefs Under the Mayors of the Palace.
- Chap. VIII.: In What Manner the Allodial Estates Were Changed Into Fiefs.
- Chap. IX.: How the Church-lands Were Converted Into Fiefs.
- Chap. X.: Riches of the Clergy.
- Chap. XI.: State of Europe At the Time of Charles Martel.
- Chap. XII.: Establishment of the Tithes.
- Chap. XIII.: Of the Election of Bishops and Abbots.
- Chap. XIV.: Of the Fiefs of Charles Martel.
- Chap. XV.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XVI.: Confusion of the Royalty and Mayoralty. the Second Race.
- Chap. XVII.: A Particular Circumstance In the Election of the Kings of the Second Race.
- Chap. XVIII.: Charlemaign.
- Chap. XIX.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XX.: Lewis the Debonnaire.
- Chap. XXI.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXIII.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXIV.: That the Freemen Were Rendered Capable of Holding Fiefs.
- Chap. XXV.: The Principal Cause of the Humiliation of the Second Race. Changes In the Allodia.
- Chap. XXVI.: Changes In the Fiefs.
- Chap. XXVII.: Another Change Which Happened In the Fiefs.
- Chap. XXVIII.: Changes Which Happened In the Great Offices, and In the Fiefs.
- Chap. XXIX.: Of the Nature of the Fiefs After the Reign of Charles the Bald.
- Chap. XXX.: The Same Subject Continued.
- Chap. XXXI.: In What Manner the Empire Was Transferred From the Family of Charlemaign.
- Chap. XXXII.: In What Manner the Crown of France Was Transferred to the House of Hugh Capet.
- Chap. XXXIII.: Some Consequences of the Perpetuity of Fiefs.
- Chap. XXXIV.: The Same Subject Continued.
CHAP. IX.
Of the Commerce of the Grecian Kings after the Death of Alexander.
AT the time when Alexander made the conquest of Egypt, they had but a very imperfect idea of the Red sea, and none at all of the ocean, which joining to this sea, on one side washes the coast of Africa, and on the other, that of Arabia; nay, they thought it impossible to sail round the peninsula of Arabia. They who attempted it on each side, had relinquished their design. “How is it possible, said they, to navigate to the southern coast of Arabia, when Cambyses’s army, which traversed it on the north side, almost entirely perished; and the forces which Ptolemy, the son of Lagus, sent to the assistance of Seleucus Nicator at Babylon, underwent incredible hardships, and, upon account of the heats, could march only in the night?”
The Persians were entire-strangers to navigation. When they had subdued Egypt, they introduced the same spirit into that country as prevailed in Persia: hence so great was the supineness of the Persians, in this respect, that the Grecian kings found them quite strangers, not only to the commerce of the Tyrians, Idumeans, and the Jews, on the ocean, but even to the navigation of the Red sea. I am apt to think, that the destruction of the first Tyre by Nebuchadnezzar, together with the subversion of several petty nations and towns bordering on the Red sea, had obliterated all their former knowledge of commerce.
Egypt, at the time of the Persian monarchy, did not front the Red sea; it contained only that long narrow neck of land which the Nile covers with its inundations, and is enclosed on both sides by a chain of mountains. They were, therefore, under the necessity of making a second discovery of the ocean and the Red sea; and this discovery engaged the curiosity of the Grecian monarchs.
They ascended the Nile, and hunted after elephants in the countries situated between that river and the sea; by this progression they traced the sea-coast; and as the discoveries were made by the Greeks, the names are all Grecian, and the temples are consecrated to Greek divinities.
The Greeks settled in Egypt were able to command a most extensive commerce; they were masters of all the harbours on the Red sea; Tyre, the rival of every trading nation, was no more; they were not constrained by the ancient superstitions of the country; in short, Egypt was become the centre of the world.
The kings of Syria left the commerce of the south to those of Egypt, and attached themselves only to the northern trade, which was carried on by means of the Oxus and the Caspian sea. They then imagined, that this sea was part of the northern ocean; and Alexander, some time before his death had fitted out a fleet, in order to discover whether it communicated with the ocean by the Euxine sea, or on some other eastern sea towards India. After him, Seleucus and Antiochus applied themselves to make discoveries in it, with a particular attention; and with this view they scoured it with their fleets. That part which Seleucus surveyed, was called the Seleucidian sea; that which Antiochus discovered, received the name of the sea of Antiochus. Attentive to the projects they might have formed on that side, they neglected the seas on the south: whether it was that the Ptolemies, by means of their fleets on the Red sea, were already become the masters of it; or that they discovered an invincible aversion in the Persians against engaging in maritime affairs. The southern coasts of Persia supplied them with no seamen; there had been none in those parts, except towards the latter end of Alexander’s reign. But the Egyptian kings being masters of the isle of Cyprus, of Phœnicia, and of a great number of towns on the coast of Asia minor, were possessed of all sorts of conveniencies for undertaking maritime expeditions. They had no occasion to force, they had only to follow the genius and bent of their subjects.
I am surprized, I confess, at the obstinacy with which the ancients believed that the Caspian sea was a part of the ocean. The expeditions of Alexander, of the kings of Syria, of the Parthians and the Romans, could not make them change their sentiments; notwithstanding these nations described the Caspian sea with a wonderful exactness; but men are generally tenacious of their errors. When only the south of this sea was known, it was at first taken for the ocean; in proportion as they advanced along the banks of the northern coast, instead of imagining it a great lake, they still believed it to be the ocean, that here made a sort of a bay: surveying the coast, their discoveries never went eastward beyond the Jaxartes, nor westward further than the extremity of Albania. The sea towards the north was shallow, and of course very unfit for navigation. Hence it was, that they always looked upon this as the ocean.
The land army of Alexander had been on the east only as far as the Hypanis, which is the last of those rivers that fall into the Indus: thus the first trade which the Greeks carried on to the Indies was confined to a very small part of the country. Seleucus Nicator penetrated as far as the Ganges, and there by discovered the sea into which this river falls, that is to say, the bay of Bengal. The moderns discover countries by voyages at sea; the ancients discovered seas by conquests at land.
Strabo, notwithstanding the testimony of Apollodorus, seems to doubt whether the Grecian kings of Bactria proceeded farther than Seleucus and Alexander. Were it even true that they went no further to the east than Seleucus, yet they went farther towards the south: they discovered Siger, and the ports on the coast of Malabar, which gave rise to the navigation I am going to mention.
Pliny informs us, that the navigation of the Indies was successively carried on by three different ways. At first they sailed from the cape of Siagre to the island of Patalena, which is at the mouth of the Indus. This we find was the course that Alexander’s fleet steered to the Indies. They took afterwards, a shorter and more certain course, by sailing from the same cape or promontory to Siger: this can be no other but the kingdom of Siger, mentioned by Strabo, and discovered by the Grecian kings of Bactria. Pliny, by saying that this way was shorter than the other, can mean only that the voyage was made in less time: for as Siger was discovered by the kings of Bactria, it must have been farther than the Indus: by this passage they must therefore have avoided the windings of certain coasts, and taken advantage of particular winds. The merchants at last took a third way; they sailed to Canes, or Ocelis, ports situated at the entrance of the Red sea; from whence by a west wind, they arrived at Muziris, the first staple town of the Indies, and from thence to the other ports. Here we see, that instead of sailing to the mouth of the Red sea as far as Siagre, by coasting Arabia Felix to the north-east, they steered directly from west to east, from one side to the other, by means of the monsoons, whose regular course they discovered by sailing in these latitudes. The ancients never lost sight of the coasts, but when they took advantage of these and the trade winds, which were to them a kind of compass.
Pliny says, that they set sail for the Indies in the middle of summer, and returned towards the end of December, or in the beginning of January. This is entirely conformable to our naval journals. In that part of the Indian sea which is between the peninsula of Africa, and that on this side the Ganges, there are two monsoons; the first, during which the winds blow from west to east, begins in the month of August or September; and the second, during which the wind is in the east, begins in January. Thus we set sail from Africa for Malabar, at the season of the year that Ptolemy’s fleet used to put to sea from thence; and we return too at the same time as they.
Alexander’s fleet was seven months in sailing from Patala to Susa. It set out in the month of July, that is, at a season when no ship dare now put to sea to return from the Indies. Between these two monsoons there is an interval of time, during which the winds vary; when a north wind meeting with the common winds, raises, especially near the coasts, the most terrible tempests. These continue during the months of June, July, and August. Alexander’s fleet, therefore, setting sail from Patala in the month of July, must have been exposed to many storms, and the voyage must have been long, because they sailed against the monsoon.
Pliny says, that they set out for the Indies at the end of summer; thus they spent the time proper for taking advantage of the monsoon, in their passage from Alexandria to the Red sea.
Observe here, I pray, how navigation has by little and little arrived at perfection. Darius’s fleet was two years and an half in falling down the Indus, and going to the Red sea. Afterwards the fleet of Alexander, descending the Indus, arrived at Susa in ten months, having sailed three months on the Indus, and seven on the Indian sea; at last, the passage from the coast of Malabar to the Red sea was made in forty days.
Strabo, who accounts for their ignorance of the countries between the Hypanis and the Ganges, says, there were very few of those who sailed from Egypt to the Indies, that ever proceeded so far as the Ganges. Their fleets, in fact, never went thither: they sailed with the western monsoons from the mouth of the Red sea to the coast of Malabar. They cast anchor in ports along that coast, and never attempted to get round the peninsula on this side the Ganges by cape Comorin and the coast of Coromandel. The plan of navigation laid down by the kings of Egypt and the Romans was, to set out and return the same year.
Thus it is demonstrable, that the commerce of the Greeks and Romans to the Indies was much less extensive than ours. We know immense countries, which to them were entirely unknown; we traffic with all the Indian nations; we even manage their trade, and in our bottoms carry on their commerce.
But this commerce of the ancients was carried on with far greater facility than ours. And if the moderns were to trade only to the coast of Guzarat and Malabar, and, without seeking for the southern isles, were satisfied with what these islanders brought them, they would certainly prefer the way of Egypt to that of the cape of Good-hope. Strabo informs us, that they traded thus with the people of Taprobane.