Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAP. XXI.: Of the Cruelty of Laws, in Respect to Debtors, in a Republic. - Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws

Return to Title Page for Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws

Search this Title:

CHAP. XXI.: Of the Cruelty of Laws, in Respect to Debtors, in a Republic. - Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws [1748]

Edition used:

The Complete Works of M. de Montesquieu (London: T. Evans, 1777), 4 vols. Vol. 1.

Part of: Complete Works of Montesquieu, 4 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAP. XXI.

Of the Cruelty of Laws, in Respect to Debtors, in a Republic.

GREAT is the superiority which one fellow-subject has already over another, by lending him money, which the latter borrows in order to spend, and, of course, has no longer in his possession. What must be the consequence if the laws of a republic make a farther addition to this servitude and subjection?

At Athens and Rome* it was first permitted to sell such debtors as were insolvent. Solon redressed this abuse at Athens , by ordaining that no man’s body should answer for his civil debts. But the decemvirs did not reform the same custom at Rome; and, though they had Solon’s regulation before their eyes, yet they did not choose to follow it. This is not the only passage of the law of the twelve tables in which the decemvirs shew their design of checking the spirit of democracy.

Often did those cruel laws against debtors throw the Roman republic into danger. A man, all covered with wounds, made his escape from his creditor’s house, and appeared in the forum§ . The people were moved with this spectacle, and other citizens, whom their creditors durst no longer confine, broke loose from their dungeons. They had promises made them, which were all broke. The people, upon this, having withdrawn to the Sacred Mount, obtained not an abrogation of those laws, but a magistrate to defend them. Thus they quitted a state of anarchy, but were scon in danger of falling under tyranny. Manlius, to render himself popular, was going to set those citizens at liberty, who by their inhuman creditors had been reduced to slavery. Manlius’s designs were prevented; but without remedying the evil. Particular laws facilitated to debtors the means of paying ; and, in the year of Rome 428, the consuls proposed a law* , which deprived creditors of the power of confining their debtors in their own houses . An usurer, by name Papirius, attempted to corrupt the chastity of a young man named Publius, whom he kept in irons. Sextus’s crime gave to Rome its political liberty: that of Papirius gave it also the civil.

Such was the fate of this city, that new crimes confirmed the liberty which those of a more ancient date had procured it. Appius’s attempt upon Virginia flung the people again into that horror against tyrants with which the misfortune of Lucretia had first inspired them. Thirty-seven years after the crime of the infamous Papirius an action of the like criminal nature was the cause of the people’s retiring to the Janiculum§ , and of giving new vigour to the law made for the safety of debtors.

Since that time creditors were oftener prosecuted by debtors for having violated the laws against usury, than the latter were sued for refusing to pay them.

[* ]A great many sold their children to pay their debts. Plutarch, life of Solon.

[]Plutarch, life of Solon.

[]It appears, from history, that this custom was established among the Romans before the law of the twelve tables. Livy, 1 dec. book 2.

[§ ]Dionys. Halicarn. Rom. An. book 6.

[]Plutarch, life of Furius Camillus.

[]See what follows, in the 24th chapter of the book of laws, as relative to the use of money.

[* ]One hundred and twenty years after the law of the twelve tables, eo anno plebi Romanæ velut aliud initium libertatis factum est, quod necti desierunt. Livy, lib. 8.

[]Bona debitoris, non corpus obnoxium esset. Ibid.

[]The year of Rome 465.

[]That of Platius, who made an attempt upon the body of Veturius. Valerius Maximus, book 6, art. 9. These two events ought not to be confounded; they are neither the same persons nor the same times.

[§ ]See a fragment of Dronys. Halicarn. in the extract of virtues and vices; Livy’s epitome, book 2; and Freinshemius, book 2.