Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAP. IX.: The same Subject continued. - Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws

Return to Title Page for Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws

Search this Title:

CHAP. IX.: The same Subject continued. - Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, Complete Works, vol. 1 The Spirit of Laws [1748]

Edition used:

The Complete Works of M. de Montesquieu (London: T. Evans, 1777), 4 vols. Vol. 1.

Part of: Complete Works of Montesquieu, 4 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAP. IX.

The same Subject continued.

PAULINUS having written to the emperor Alexander, that “he was preparing to prosecute, for high-treason, a judge who had decided contrary to his edict,” the emperor answered, “that under his reign there was no such thing as indirect high-treason* .”

Faustinian wrote to the same emperor, that, as he had sworn by the prince’s life never to pardon his slave, he found himself thereby obliged to perpetuate his wrath, lest he should incur the guilt of læsa majestas; upon which the emperor made answer, “Your fears are groundless , and you are a stranger to my principles.”

It was determined, by a senatus-consultum , that whosoever melted down any of the emperor’s statues, which happened to be rejected, should not be deemed guilty of high-treason. The emperors, Severus and Antoninus, wrote to Pontius§ , that those who sold unconsecrated statues of the emperor should not be charged with high-treason. The same princes wrote to Julius Cassianus, that, if a person, in flinging a stone, should by chance strike one of the emperor’s statues, he should not be liable to a prosecution for high-treason . The Julian law requires this sort of limitations; for, in virtue of this law, the crime of high-treason was charged, not only upon those who melted down the emperor’s statues, but likewise on those who committed any such like action* , which made it an arbitrary crime. When a number of crimes of læsa majestas had been established, they were obliged to distinguish the several sorts. Hence Ulpian, the civilian, after saying that the accusation of læsa majestas did not die with the criminal, adds, that this does not relate to all the treasonable acts established by the Julian law, but only to that which implies an attempt against the empire or against the emperor’s life.

[* ]Etiam ex aliis causis majestatis crimina cessant meo sæculo. Leg. 1. eod. ad leg. Jul. Maj.

[]Alienam sectæ meæ sollicitudinem concepisti. Leg. 2. eod. ad leg. Jul. Maj.

[]See the 4th law in ff. ad leg. Jul. Maj.

[§ ]See the 5th law, ibid.

[]Ibid.

[* ]Aliudve quid simile admiserint. Leg. 6. ff. ad leg. Jul. Maj.

[]In the last law in ff. ad leg. Jul. de adulteris.