|
|
Front Page Titles (by Subject) No. 79: A further view of the judicial department, in relation to the provisions for the support and responsibility of the judges - The Federalist (Gideon ed.)
No. 79: A further view of the judicial department, in relation to the provisions for the support and responsibility of the judges - George W. Carey, The Federalist (Gideon ed.) [1818]Edition used:The Federalist (The Gideon Edition), Edited with an Introduction, Reader’s Guide, Constitutional Cross-reference, Index, and Glossary by George W. Carey and James McClellan (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2001).
About Liberty Fund:Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright information:The copyright to this edition, in both print and electronic forms, is held by Liberty Fund, Inc.
Fair use statement:
This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
- Editors’ Introduction
- Reader’s Guide to the Federalist
- Preface to the Gideon Edition (1818)
- The Federalist
- No. 1: Introduction
- No. 2: Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force & Influence
- No. 3: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 4: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 5: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 6: Concerning Dangers From War Between the States
- No. 7: The Subject Continued, and Particular Causes Enumerated
- No. 8: The Effects of Internal War In Producing Standing Armies, and Other Institutions Unfriendly to Liberty
- No. 9: The Utility of the Union As a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection
- No. 10: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 11: The Utility of the Union In Respect to Commerce and a Navy
- No. 12: The Utility of the Union In Respect to Revenue
- No. 13: The Same Subject Continued, With a View to Economy
- No. 14: An Objection Drawn From the Extent of Country, Answered
- No. 15: Concerning the Defects of the Present Confederation, In Relation to the Principle of Legislation For the States In Their Collective Capacities
- No. 16: The Same Subject Continued, In Relation to the Same Principles
- No. 17: The Subject Continued, and Illustrated By Examples, to Show the Tendency of Federal Governments, Rather to Anarchy Among the Members, Than Tyranny In the Head
- No. 18 *: the Subject Continued, With Further Examples
- No. 19: The Subject Continued, With Further Examples
- No. 20: The Subject Continued, With Further Examples
- No. 21: Further Defects of the Present Constitution
- No. 22: The Same Subject Continued, and Concluded
- No. 23: The Necessity of a Government, At Least Equally Energetic With the One Proposed
- No. 24: The Subject Continued, With an Answer to an Objection Concerning Standing Armies
- No. 25: The Subject Continued, With the Same View
- No. 26: The Subject Continued With the Same View
- No. 27: The Subject Continued, With the Same View
- No. 28: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 29: Concerning the Militia
- No. 30: Concerning Taxation
- No. 31: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 32: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 33: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 34: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 35: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 36: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 37: Concerning the Difficulties Which the Convention Must Have Experienced In the Formation of a Proper Plan
- No. 38: The Subject Continued, and the Incoherence of the Objections to the Plan, Exposed
- No. 39: The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles: an Objection In Respect to the Powers of the Convention, Examined
- No. 40: The Same Objection Further Examined
- No. 41: General View of the Powers Proposed to Be Vested In the Union
- No. 42: The Same View Continued
- No. 43: The Same View Continued
- No. 44: The Same View Continued and Concluded
- No. 45: A Further Discussion of the Supposed Danger From the Powers of the Union, to the State Governments
- No. 46: The Subject of the Last Paper Resumed; With an Examination of the Comparative Means of Influence of the Federal and State Governments
- No. 47: The Meaning of the Maxim, Which Requires a Separation of the Departments of Power, Examined and Ascertained
- No. 48: The Same Subject Continued, With a View to the Means of Giving Efficacy In Practice to That Maxim
- No. 49: The Same Subject Continued, With the Same View
- No. 50: The Same Subject Continued, With the Same View
- No. 51: The Same Subject Continued, With the Same View, and Concluded
- No. 52: Concerning the House of Representatives, With a View to the Qualifications of the Electors and Elected, and the Time of Service of the Members
- No. 53: The Same Subject Continued, With a View of the Term of Service of the Members
- No. 54: The Same Subject Continued, With a View to the Ratio of Representation
- No. 55: The Same Subject Continued, In Relation to the Total Number of the Body
- No. 56: The Same Subject Continued, In Relation to the Same Point
- No. 57: The Same Subject Continued, In Relation to the Supposed Tendency of the Plan of the Convention to Elevate the Few Above the Many
- No. 58: The Same Subject Continued, In Relation to the Future Augmentation of the Members
- No. 59: Concerning the Regulation of Elections
- No. 60: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 61: The Same Subject Continued, and Concluded
- No. 62: Concerning the Constitution of the Senate, With Regard to the Qualifications of the Members; the Manner of Appointing Them; the Equality of Representation; the Number of the Senators, and the Duration of Their Appointments
- No. 63: A Further View of the Constitution of the Senate, In Regard to the Duration of the Appointment of Its Members
- No. 64: A Further View of the Constitution of the Senate, In Regard to the Power of Making Treaties
- No. 65: A Further View of the Constitution of the Senate, In Relation to Its Capacity, As a Court For the Trial of Impeachments
- No. 66: The Same Subject Continued
- No. 67: Concerning the Constitution of the President: a Gross Attempt to Misrepresent This Part of the Plan Detected
- No. 68: The View of the Constitution of the President Continued, In Relation to the Mode of Appointment
- No. 69: The Same View Continued, With a Comparison Between the President and the King of Great Britain, On the One Hand, and the Governor of New York, On the Other
- No. 70: The Same View Continued, In Relation to the Unity of the Executive, and With an Examination of the Project of an Executive Council
- No. 71: The Same View Continued, In Regard to the Duration of the Office
- No. 72: The Same View Continued, In Regard to the Re-eligibility of the President
- No. 73: The Same View Continued, In Relation to the Provision Concerning Support, and the Power of the Negative
- No. 74: The Same View Continued, In Relation to the Command of the National Forces, and the Power of Pardoning
- No. 75: The Same View Continued, In Relation to the Power of Making Treaties
- No. 76: The Same View Continued, In Relation to the Appointment of the Officers of the Government
- No. 77: The View of the Constitution of the President Concluded, With a Further Consideration of the Power of Appointment, and a Concise Examination of His Remaining Powers
- No. 78: A View of the Constitution of the Judicial Department In Relation to the Tenure of Good Behaviour
- No. 79: A Further View of the Judicial Department, In Relation to the Provisions For the Support and Responsibility of the Judges
- No. 80: A Further View of the Judicial Department, In Relation to the Extent of Its Powers
- No. 81: A Further View of the Judicial Department, In Relation to the Distribution of Its Authority
- No. 82: A Further View of the Judicial Department, In Reference to Some Miscellaneous Questions
- No. 83: A Further View of the Judicial Department, In Relation to the Trial By Jury
- No. 84: Concerning Several Miscellaneous Objections
- No. 85: Conclusion
- Glossary
- Appendixes
- Appendix 1: The Declaration of Independence * In Congress, July 4, 1776
- Appendix 2: Articles of Confederation * March 1, 1781
- Appendix 3: Virginia Resolution Proposing the Annapolis Convention * January 21, 1786
- Appendix 4: Proceedings of the Annapolis Convention *
- Appendix 5: Virginia Resolution Providing For Delegates to the Federal Convention of 1787 * November 23, 1786
- Appendix 6: Call By the Continental Congress For the Federal Convention of 1787 * Wednesday Feby. 21, 1787
- Appendix 7: Resolution of the Federal Convention Submitting the Constitution to the Continental Congress * In Convention Monday September 17th 1787
- Appendix 8: Washington’s Letter of Transmittal to the President of the Continental Congress * In Convention, September 17, 1787
- Appendix 9: Resolution of the Continental Congress Submitting the Constitution to the Several States * Friday Sept 28. 1787
- Appendix 10: Letter of the Secretary of the Continental Congress Transmitting Copy of the Constitution to the Several Governors *
- The Constitution of the United States (cross-referenced With the Federalist ) *
- The Amendments
No. 79
by Alexander Hamilton
A further view of the judicial department, in relation to the provisions for the support and responsibility of the judges
Next to permanency in office, nothing can contribute more to the independence of the judges, than a fixed provision for their support. The remark made in relation to the president, is equally applicable here. In the general course of human nature, a power over a man’s subsistence amounts to a power over his will. And we can never hope to see realized in practice the complete separation of the judicial from the legislative power, in any system which leaves the former dependent for pecuniary resource on the occasional grants of the latter. The enlightened friends to good government, in every state, have seen cause to lament the want of precise and explicit precautions in the state constitutions on this head. Some of these indeed have declared that permanent salaries should be established for the judges; but the experiment has in some instances shown, that such expressions are not sufficiently definite to preclude legislative evasions. Something still more positive and unequivocal has been evinced to be requisite. The plan of the convention accordingly has provided, that the judges of the United States “shall at stated times receive for their services a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.”
This, all circumstances considered, is the most eligible provision that could have been devised. It will readily be understood, that the fluctuations in the value of money, and in the state of society, rendered a fixed rate of compensation in the constitution inadmissible. What might be extravagant to-day, might in half a century become penurious and inadequate. It was therefore necessary to leave it to the discretion of the legislature to vary its provisions in conformity to the variations in circumstances; yet under such restrictions as to put it out of the power of that body to change the condition of the individual for the worse. A man may then be sure of the ground upon which he stands, and can never be deterred from his duty by the app[r]ehension of being placed in a less eligible situation. The clause which has been quoted combines both advantages. The salaries of judicial offices may from time to time be altered, as occasion shall require, yet so as never to lessen the allowance with which any particular judge comes into office, in respect to him. It will be observed that a difference has been made by the convention between the compensation of the president and of the judges. That of the former can neither be increased nor diminished. That of the latter can only not be diminished. This probably arose from the difference in the duration of the respective offices. As the president is to be elected for no more than four years, it can rarely happen that an adequate salary, fixed at the commencement of that period, will not continue to be such to its end. But with regard to the judges, who, if they behave properly, will be secured in their places for life, it may well happen, especially in the early stages of the government, that a stipend, which would be very sufficient at their first appointment, would become too small in the progress of their service.
This provision for the support of the judges bears every mark of prudence and efficacy; and it may be safely affirmed that, together with the permanent tenure of their offices, it affords a better prospect of their independence than is discoverable in the constitutions of any of the states, in regard to their own judges.
The precautions for their responsibility, are comprised in the article respecting impeachments. They are liable to be impeached for mal-conduct by the house of representatives, and tried by the senate, and if convicted, may be dismissed from office and disqualified for holding any other. This is the only provision on the point, which is consistent with the necessary independence of the judicial character, and is the only one which we find in our own constitution in respect to our own judges.
The want of a provision for removing the judges on account of inability, has been a subject of complaint. But all considerate men will be sensible that such a provision would either not be practised upon, or would be more liable to abuse, than calculated to answer any good purpose. The mensuration of the faculties of the mind has, I believe, no place in the catalogue of known arts. An attempt to fix the boundary between the regions of ability and inability, would much oftener give scope to personal and party attachments and enmities, than advance the interests of justice, or the public good. The result, except in the case of insanity, must for the most part be arbitrary; and insanity, without any formal or express provision, may be safely pronounced to be a virtual disqualification.
The constitution of New York, to avoid investigations that must forever be vague and dangerous, has taken a particular age as the criterion of inability. No man can be a judge beyond sixty. I believe there are few at present who do not disapprove of this provision. There is no station, in relation to which it is less proper than to that of a judge. The deliberating and comparing faculties generally preserve their strength much beyond that period, in men who survive it; and when, in addition to this circumstance, we consider how few there are who outlive the season of intellectual vigour, and how improbable it is that any considerable proportion of the bench, whether more or less numerous, should be in such a situation at the same time, we shall be ready to conclude that limitations of this sort have little to recommend them. In a republic, where fortunes are not affluent, and pensions not expedient, the dismission of men from stations in which they have served their country long and usefully, on which they depend for subsistence, and from which it will be too late to resort to any other occupation for a livelihood, ought to have some better apology to humanity, than is to be found in the imaginary danger of a superannuated bench.
publius
|