The Online Library of Liberty

A project of Liberty Fund, Inc.

• Introduction
• Foreword
• The Law
• Life Is a Gift From God
• What Is Law?
• A Just and Enduring Government
• The Complete Perversion of the Law
• A Fatal Tendency of Mankind
• Property and Plunder
• Victims of Lawful Plunder
• The Results of Legal Plunder
• The Fate of Non-conformists
• Who Shall Judge?
• The Reason Why Voting Is Restricted
• The Answer Is to Restrict the Law
• The Fatal Idea of Legal Plunder
• Perverted Law Causes Conflict
• Slavery and Tariffs Are Plunder
• Two Kinds of Plunder
• The Law Defends Plunder
• How to Identify Legal Plunder
• Legal Plunder Has Many Names
• Socialism Is Legal Plunder
• The Choice Before Us
• The Proper Function of the Law
• The Seductive Lure of Socialism
• Enforced Fraternity Destroys Liberty
• Plunder Violates Ownership
• Three Systems of Plunder
• Law Is Force
• Law Is a Negative Concept
• The Political Approach
• The Law and Charity
• The Law and Education
• The Law and Morals
• A Confusion of Terms
• The Influence of Socialist Writers
• The Socialists Wish to Play God
• The Socialists Despise Mankind
• A Defense of Compulsory Labor
• A Defense of Paternal Government
• The Idea of Passive Mankind
• Socialists Ignore Reason and Facts
• Socialists Want to Regiment People
• A Famous Name and an Evil Idea
• A Frightful Idea
• The Leader of the Democrats
• Socialists Want Forced Conformity
• Legislators Desire to Mold Mankind
• Legislators Told How to Manage Men
• A Temporary Dictatorship
• Socialists Want Equality of Wealth
• The Error of the Socialist Writers
• What Is Liberty?
• Philanthropic Tyranny
• The Socialists Want Dictatorship
• Dictatorial Arrogance
• The Indirect Approach to Despotism
• Napoleon Wanted Passive Mankind
• The Vicious Circle of Socialism
• The Doctrine of the Democrats
• The Socialist Concept of Liberty
• Socialists Fear All Liberties
• The Superman Idea
• The Socialists Reject Free Choice
• The Cause of French Revolutions
• The Enormous Power of Government
• Politics and Economics
• Proper Legislative Functions
• Law and Charity Are Not the Same
• The High Road to Communism
• The Basis For Stable Government
• Justice Means Equal Rights
• The Path to Dignity and Progress
• Proof of an Idea
• The Desire to Rule Over Others
• Let Us Now Try Liberty
• The Book and Author
• The Translation
• About the Publisher

Socialists Fear All Liberties

Well, what liberty should the legislators permit people to have? Liberty of conscience? (But if this were permitted, we would see the people taking this opportunity to become atheists.)

Then liberty of education? (But parents would pay professors to teach their children immorality and falsehoods; besides, according to Mr. Thiers, if education were left to national liberty, it would cease to be national, and we would be teaching our children the ideas of the Turks or Hindus; whereas, thanks to this legal despotism over education, our children now have the good fortune to be taught the noble ideas of the Romans.)

Then liberty of labor? (But that would mean competition which, in turn, leaves production unconsumed, ruins businessmen, and exterminates the people.)

Perhaps liberty of trade? (But everyone knows—and the advocates of protective tariffs have proved over and over again—that freedom of trade ruins every person who engages in it, and that it is necessary to suppress freedom of trade in order to prosper.)

Possibly then, liberty of association? (But, according to socialist doctrine, true liberty and voluntary association are in contradiction to each other, and the purpose of the socialists is to suppress liberty of association precisely in order to force people to associate together in true liberty.)

Clearly then, the conscience of the social democrats cannot permit persons to have any liberty because they believe that the nature of mankind tends always toward every kind of degradation and disaster. Thus, of course, the legislators must make plans for the people in order to save them from themselves.

This line of reasoning brings us to a challenging question: If people are as incapable, as immoral, and as ignorant as the politicians indicate, then why is the right of these same people to vote defended with such passionate insistence?