The Online Library of Liberty

A project of Liberty Fund, Inc.

• Introduction
• Foreword
• The Law
• Life Is a Gift From God
• What Is Law?
• A Just and Enduring Government
• The Complete Perversion of the Law
• A Fatal Tendency of Mankind
• Property and Plunder
• Victims of Lawful Plunder
• The Results of Legal Plunder
• The Fate of Non-conformists
• Who Shall Judge?
• The Reason Why Voting Is Restricted
• The Answer Is to Restrict the Law
• The Fatal Idea of Legal Plunder
• Perverted Law Causes Conflict
• Slavery and Tariffs Are Plunder
• Two Kinds of Plunder
• The Law Defends Plunder
• How to Identify Legal Plunder
• Legal Plunder Has Many Names
• Socialism Is Legal Plunder
• The Choice Before Us
• The Proper Function of the Law
• The Seductive Lure of Socialism
• Enforced Fraternity Destroys Liberty
• Plunder Violates Ownership
• Three Systems of Plunder
• Law Is Force
• Law Is a Negative Concept
• The Political Approach
• The Law and Charity
• The Law and Education
• The Law and Morals
• A Confusion of Terms
• The Influence of Socialist Writers
• The Socialists Wish to Play God
• The Socialists Despise Mankind
• A Defense of Compulsory Labor
• A Defense of Paternal Government
• The Idea of Passive Mankind
• Socialists Ignore Reason and Facts
• Socialists Want to Regiment People
• A Famous Name and an Evil Idea
• A Frightful Idea
• The Leader of the Democrats
• Socialists Want Forced Conformity
• Legislators Desire to Mold Mankind
• Legislators Told How to Manage Men
• A Temporary Dictatorship
• Socialists Want Equality of Wealth
• The Error of the Socialist Writers
• What Is Liberty?
• Philanthropic Tyranny
• The Socialists Want Dictatorship
• Dictatorial Arrogance
• The Indirect Approach to Despotism
• Napoleon Wanted Passive Mankind
• The Vicious Circle of Socialism
• The Doctrine of the Democrats
• The Socialist Concept of Liberty
• Socialists Fear All Liberties
• The Superman Idea
• The Socialists Reject Free Choice
• The Cause of French Revolutions
• The Enormous Power of Government
• Politics and Economics
• Proper Legislative Functions
• Law and Charity Are Not the Same
• The High Road to Communism
• The Basis For Stable Government
• Justice Means Equal Rights
• The Path to Dignity and Progress
• Proof of an Idea
• The Desire to Rule Over Others
• Let Us Now Try Liberty
• The Book and Author
• The Translation
• About the Publisher

The Answer Is to Restrict the Law

I know what might be said in answer to this; what the objections might be. But this is not the place to exhaust a controversy of this nature. I wish merely to observe here that this controversy over universal suffrage (as well as most other political questions) which agitates, excites, and overthrows nations, would lose nearly all of its importance if the law had always been what it ought to be.

In fact, if law were restricted to protecting all persons, all liberties, and all properties; if law were nothing more than the organized combination of the individual's right to self defense; if law were the obstacle, the check, the punisher of all oppression and plunder—is it likely that we citizens would then argue much about the extent of the franchise?

Under these circumstances, is it likely that the extent of the right to vote would endanger that supreme good, the public peace? Is it likely that the excluded classes would refuse to peaceably await the coming of their right to vote? Is it likely that those who had the right to vote would jealously defend their privilege?

If the law were confined to its proper functions, everyone's interest in the law would be the same. Is it not clear that, under these circumstances, those who voted could not inconvenience those who did not vote?