EconlibThe LibraryOther Sites |
Front Page Titles (by Subject) CHARLES IX. - The Works of Voltaire, Vol. IV (Philosophical Dictionary Part 2)
Return to Title Page for The Works of Voltaire, Vol. IV (Philosophical Dictionary Part 2)The Online Library of LibertyA project of Liberty Fund, Inc.Search this Title:Also in the Library:
CHARLES IX. - Voltaire, The Works of Voltaire, Vol. IV (Philosophical Dictionary Part 2) [1764]Edition used:The Works of Voltaire. A Contemporary Version. A Critique and Biography by John Morley, notes by Tobias Smollett, trans. William F. Fleming (New York: E.R. DuMont, 1901). In 21 vols. Vol. IV.
Part of: The Works of Voltaire. A Contemporary Version, in 21 vols.About Liberty Fund:Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright information:The text is in the public domain. Fair use statement:This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
CHARLES IX.Charles IX., king of France, was, we are told, a good poet. It is quite certain that while he lived his verses were admired. Brantôme does not, indeed, tell us that this king was the best poet in Europe, but he assures us that “he made very genteel quatrains impromptu, without thinking (for he had seen several of them), and when it was wet or gloomy weather, or very hot, he would send for the poets into his cabinet and pass his time there with them.” Had he always passed his time thus, and, above all, had he made good verses, we should not have had a St. Bartholomew, he would not have fired with a carbine through his window upon his own subjects, as if they had been a covey of partridges. Is it not impossible for a good poet to be a barbarian? I am persuaded it is. These lines, addressed in his name to Ronsard, have been attributed to him:
These lines are good. But are they his? Are they not his preceptor’s? Here are some of his royal imaginings, which are somewhat different:
These are worthy the author of the massacre of St. Bartholomew. Cæsar’s lines on Terence are written with rather more spirit and taste; they breathe Roman urbanity. In those of Francis I. and Charles IX. we find the barbarism of the Celts. Would to God that Charles IX. had written more verses, even though bad ones! For constant application to the fine arts softens the manners and dispels ferocity: Emollit mores, nec sinit esse feros.Besides, the French languages scarcely began to take any form until long after Charles IX. See such of Francis I.’s letters as have been preserved: “Tout est perdu hors l’honneur”—“All is lost save honor”—was worthy of a chevalier. But the following is neither in the style of Cicero nor in that of Cæsar: ![]() Death of Coligny. “Tout a fleure ynsi que je me volois mettre o lit est arrivé Laval qui m’a aporté la serteneté du lévement du siege.” “All was going so well that, when I was going to bed Laval arrived, and brought me the certainty of the siege being raised.” We have letters from the hand of Louis XIII., which are no better written. It is not required of a king to write letters like Pliny, or verses like Virgil; but no one can be excused from expressing himself with propriety in his own tongue. Every prince that writes like a lady’s maid has been ill educated. |

Titles (by Subject) 