Front Page Titles (by Subject) MEDICAL REVIEWS 1834, 1842 - The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXXI - Miscellaneous Writings
Return to Title Page for The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXXI - Miscellaneous Writings
The Online Library of Liberty
A project of Liberty Fund, Inc.
Search this Title:
MEDICAL REVIEWS 1834, 1842 - John Stuart Mill, The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXXI - Miscellaneous Writings 
The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XXXI - Miscellaneous Writings, ed. John M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1989).
About Liberty Fund:
Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.
The online edition of the Collected Works is published under licence from the copyright holder, The University of Toronto Press. ©2006 The University of Toronto Press. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form or medium without the permission of The University of Toronto Press.
Fair use statement:
This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
Dr. King’s Lecture on the Study of Anatomy
Monthly Repository, VIII (Nov. 1834), 817-18. Subtitled: “Delivered at the reopening of the School founded by the late Joshua Brooks, Esq. October 1, 1833.” In the “Critical Notices” section. A review of The Substance of a Lecture Designed as an Introduction to the Study of Anatomy Considered as the Science of Organization: and Delivered at the Reopening of the School, Founded by the late Joshua Brookes, Esq. October 1st, 1833 (London: Longman, et al., 1834), by Thomas King (1802-39). Unsigned. Not republished. Identified in Mill’s bibliography as “A brief notice of Dr. King’s lecture on the study of anatomy; in the Monthly Repository for November 1834”
(MacMinn, p. 42).
dr. king’s lecture is an excellent specimen of the lucid and methodical exposition and philosophic views of the nature of classification which characterise the French anatomists and physiologists. It also contains a surprising quantity, considering its shortness, of the most important elementary facts of the human organization, explained in a manner peculiarly well suited, not only to learners, but even to non-medical readers. Dr. King has evidently some of the highest qualities of an able teacher.
Westminster Review, XXXVII (Jan. 1842), 254. Headed with the title of the book reviewed: “Principles of General and Comparative Physiology, intended as an Introduction to the study of Human Physiology, and as a guide to the Philosophical pursuit of Natural History, by William B. Carpenter, M.D., Lecturer on Physiology in the Bristol Medical School, etc. Second Edition, 1841. [London:] Churchill.” In the “Miscellaneous Notices” section. Signed “S.” Not republished. Identified in Mill’s bibliography as “A short notice of Dr. Carpenter’s Principles of General and Comparative Physiology, in the Westminster Review for January 1842”
(MacMinn, p. 54).
this is a book to which justice cannot be done without a much fuller notice than can be given in this part of our journal, and we shall probably return to it in a future number. The author (who is the son of the late respected Dr. Lant Carpenter, of Bristol, and who, though still a young man, has long been known as a physiologist of eminence)1 has not only accumulated in this work a richer store of the mere facts of the science than we believe is to be obtained in the same compass elsewhere, but has displayed in an eminent degree one of the principal attributes of a philosopher, as distinguished from a mere man of science, the power of generalizing. To the experienced reader, it is already some indication of this quality, that Dr. Carpenter includes in his design the physiology of plants as well as of animals, the best physiologists being now convinced that so far as respects mere organic life, the formation, nutrition, and reproduction of the living body (independently of the superadded casualties of sensation and voluntary motion), there is no fundamental distinction between the animal and vegetable creation, but both are governed by essentially the same organic laws, variously modified by circumstances.
In Dr. Carpenter’s book this and a large body of similar truths are established and illustrated with a very uncommon degree of philosophic power, and the work may be considered as a clear exposition of the highest generalities yet arrived at in the science of life. As such breadth of speculation and reach of philosophy, applied to this subject, have not hitherto been often exemplified in this country, English writers having remained greatly inferior in this highest scientific attribute to the physiologists of France and Germany, it is highly creditable to our scientific and medical public that Dr. Carpenter’s work has been warmly welcomed and highly applauded by almost all the professional periodicals,2 and by most of those scientific authorities whose praise confers real honour.
[1 ]William Benjamin Carpenter (1813-85) was the son of Lant Carpenter (1780-1840), a Unitarian preacher, polemicist, and schoolmaster.
[2 ]See, e.g., the anonymous reviews in the British and Foreign Medical Review, VII (Jan. 1830), 168-85, and the Medical Gazette, 2 Feb., 1839, 675-8.