Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow Sect. 3.: Entry of a Trial instanter in the Court of King's Bench, upon a Collateral Issue; and Rule of Court for Execution thereon. - Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, vol. 2

Return to Title Page for Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, vol. 2

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Subject Area: Law

Sect. 3.: Entry of a Trial instanter in the Court of King’s Bench, upon a Collateral Issue; and Rule of Court for Execution thereon. - Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, vol. 2 [1753]

Edition used:

Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books. Notes selected from the editions of Archibold, Christian, Coleridge, Chitty, Stewart, Kerr, and others, Barron Field’s Analysis, and Additional Notes, and a Life of the Author by George Sharswood. In Two Volumes. (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co., 1893).

Part of: Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books, 2 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


Sect. 3.

Entry of a Trial instanter in the Court of King’s Bench, upon a Collateral Issue; and Rule of Court for Execution thereon.

Michaelmas Term, in the Sixth Year of the Reign of King George the Third.

Kent; The King against Thomas Rogers. } The prisoner at the bar being brought into this court in custody of the sheriff of the county of Sussex, by virtue of his majesty’s writ of habeas corpus,Habeas corpus. Record of attainder read,it is ordered that the said writ and the return thereto be filed. And it appearing by a certain record of attainder, which hath been removed into this court by his majesty’s writ of certiorari, that the prisoner at the bar stands attainted, by the name of Thomas Rogers, of felony for a robbery on the highway,for felony and robbery. Prisoner asked what he can say in bar of execution. and the said prisoner at the bar having heard the record of the said attainder now read to him, is now asked by the court here what he hath to say for himself why the court here should not proceed to award execution against him upon the said attainder.Plea: not the same person.He for plea saith that he is not the same Thomas Rogers in the said record of attainder named, and against whom judgment was pronounced; and this he is ready to verify and prove, &c. To which said plea the honourable Charles Yorke,Replication,esquire, attorney-general of our present sovereign lord the king, who for our said lord the king in this behalf prosecuteth, being now present here in court, and having heard what the said prisoner at the bar hath now alleged, for our said lord the king by way of reply saith,averring that he is. that the said prisoner now here at the bar is the same Thomas Rogers in the said record of attainder named, and against whom judgment was pronounced as aforesaid; and this he prayeth may be inquired into by the country;Issue joined. and the said prisoner at the bar doth the like: Therefore let a jury in this behalf immediately come here into court, by whom the truth of the matter will be the better known,Venire awarded instanter.and who have no affinity to the said prisoner, to try upon their oath whether the said prisoner at the bar be the same Thomas Rogers in the said record of attainder named, and against whom judgment was so pronounced as aforesaid, or not: because as well the said Charles Yorke, esquire, attorney-general of our said lord the king, who for our said lord the king in this behalf prosecutes, as the said prisoner at the bar, have put themselves in this behalf upon the said jury. And immediately thereupon the said jury come here into court;Jury sworn. and, being elected, tried, and sworn to speak the truth touching and concerning the premises aforesaid, and having heard the said record read to them, do say upon their oath that the said prisoner at the bar is the same Thomas Rogers in the said record of attainder named,Verdict: that he is the same. and against whom judgment was so pronounced as aforesaid, in manner and form as the said attorney-general hath by his said replication to the said plea of the said prisoner now here at the bar alleged. And hereupon the said attorney-general on behalf of our said lord the king now prayeth, that the court here would proceed to award execution against him the said Thomas Rogers upon the said attainder.Award of execution.Whereupon, all and singular the premises being now seen and fully understood by the court here, it is ordered by the court here that execution be done upon the said prisoner at the bar for the said felony in pursuance of the said judgment, according to due form of law: And it is lastly ordered that he the said Thomas Rogers, the prisoner at the bar, be now committed to the custody of the sheriff of the county of Kent (now also present here in court) for the purpose aforesaid; and that the said sheriff of Kent do execution upon the said defendant the prisoner at the bar for the said felony, in pursuance of the said judgment, according to due form of law. On the motion of Mr. Attorney-General.

By the Court.