Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow BOOK III.—: EITHERSIDE FALLACIES. - The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 10 (Memoirs Part I and Correspondence)

Return to Title Page for The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 10 (Memoirs Part I and Correspondence)

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Subject Area: Political Theory
Subject Area: Law

BOOK III.—: EITHERSIDE FALLACIES. - Jeremy Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 10 (Memoirs Part I and Correspondence) [1843]

Edition used:

The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1838-1843). 11 vols. Vol. 10.

Part of: The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


BOOK III.—

EITHERSIDE FALLACIES.

Part VII.—

Fallacies, applying to men’s sympathies.

Ch. I. (1.) Laudable-motive-trumpeter’s argument.

☞ For examples, see Erskine’s Defence, and Burke’s Pamphlets—Debates, and Morning Chronicles.

Ch. II. (2.) Laudable-design-trumpeter’s argument. See do.

Ch. III. (3.) Laudable-character-trumpeter’s argument. See do.

Ch. IV. (4.) Consistency-trumpeter’s argument. See do.

Ch. V. (5.) Inbred-laudable-disposition-trumpeter’s argument. See do.

Ch. VI. (6.) Laudable-connexion-trumpeter’s argument. See do.

Ch. VII. (7.) Good-name-bestower’s; or, Puffing-godfather’s argument. See do.

Ch. VIII. (8.) Human-idol-trumpeter’s; or, Deified-dead-man-trumpeter’s argument.

Ch. IX. (9.) Self-trumpeter’s; or, Pretty-poll’s; or, Who-but-I’s argument. See do.

Part VIII.—

Fallacies, applying to the Judicial faculty.

Ch. I. (1.) Question-begging-denomination-employer’s; or, Crafty-generalizer’s argument.

Ch. II. (2.) Calculation-spurning-partiality-preacher’s device. Argue not against use from abuse.

Ch. III. (3.) Calculation-scorning-atrocity-justifier’s argument. The end justifies the means.

Ch. IV. (4.) Eulogizing-lumping-classifier’s; or, Logical-cloud-climber’s; or, Logical-high-flyer’s; or, Distinction-confounder’s; or, Discrimination-eluder’s; or, Deformity-cloaker’s device.*

Ch. V. (5.) Sham-distinguisher’s device. Respect the liberty, but crush the licentiousness of the press.

Ch. VI. (6.) Cause—obstacle—and uninfluencing-circumstance-confounder’s device or argument. Before it, or along with it, therefore the cause of it.

Ch. VII. (7.) Bar-vice-amendment-urger’s; or, Lumping-condemner’s device.

Ch. VIII. (8.) Crafty-diversion-creator’s argument. Why this, when there is that and that?

Ch. IX. (9.) General-rule-strainer’s device. *∗* Quere, exemplar?

Ch. X. (10.) Opposer-general’s; or, Defender-general’s justification argument. Not measures but men; or, Not men but measures.

[* ] Examples of clouds, cloaks, and foul spots covered by them:—

Cloaks.Foul Spots covered by them.
1. Order, repose, quiet, internal peace, tranquillity of states.1. Tyranny—viz. by
1. Force.
2. Intimidation.
2. Forms.2. Fraud and tyranny in all shapes.
3. Influence.3. Intimidation and corruption.
4. Law.4. Its abuses in all shapes.
5. Church.5. Its abuses in all shapes.
6. Constitution.6. Its imperfection.
7. English Institutions.7. The bad ones, and the imperfections in the good ones.

[† ] For examples, give a list of states of things, with their true causes, and the obstacles, and uninfluencing circumstances erroneously assigned as causes of them.