The Online Library of Liberty

A project of Liberty Fund, Inc.

• Preface.
• Letters and Journal of W. Stanley Jevons.
• Chapter I.: 1835–1851.
• Chapter II.: 1851–1854.
• Chapter III.: 1854–1859.
• Chapter IV.: 1859.
• Chapter V.: 1859–1859.
• Chapter VI.: 1863–1863.
• Chapter VII.: 1866–1866.
• Chapter VIII.: 1868–1872.
• Chapter IX.: 1872–1874.
• Chapter X.: 1874–1876.
• Chapter XI.: 1876–1880.
• Chapter XII.: 1880–1882.
• Appendix A.
• Letter From H. R. Grenfell, Esq.
• To H. R. Grenfell, Esq.
• Appendix B.: Mr. Jevons' Writings.

Letter from H. R. Grenfell, Esq.

8th May 1882.

In reply to your most kind letter of yesterday, I beg to say that I quite concur with you in saying that it is necessary to draw a clear distinction between the speculative and practical aspects of the Silver Question. The worst of all these questions is that those capable of reducing them to theoretical expressions are very often incapable of understanding what happens in business.

I served a sort of apprenticeship to Lord Halifax, as far as the parliamentary and political view of currency was concerned, but I always found it most difficult to explain what really happens in business to him. On the other hand, it is equally impossible for those whose whole minds are occupied with the daily search after a profit, which commerce is, to clear away irrelevant matter from a discussion which ought to be as clearly defined in its terms as a problem in Euclid.

Before you finish your labours now on hand, would it assist you to know what is really going on? I should like very much to impart to you what I know on this point, unless you are already in communication with those better informed than myself.

In order to get to practical work it seems necessary to avoid trailing hares across the paths of those seriously desirous of a solution. You will forgive me for saying that the proposition for the issue of one pound notes partakes of the nature of a hare.

Palgrave's proposition to discuss “Bank Money” is of the same nature. Likewise his assertion that it is a banking rather than a currency question. There seem to me to be three practical solutions:

1. To leave it alone.

2. To make gold the universal standard, leaving silver to be used as an inferior currency at the value settled in each country, and internationally at the price of the day.

3. To resort to bimetallism—that is, not necessarily for England to join in an agreement, but by offering such terms as would induce those interested to make an agreement.

No. 2 does not appear to me to differ in any essential point from No. 1.

Can you enlighten me as to whether it does, and if it does, to what extent? I ask you this because practically No. 2 is what is proposed by Lord Grey, C. Daniell, and numbers of “haute finance” people in many countries, whose opinions are of great importance, but who have not taken part in the written discussions.