Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow MERCHANT VESSELS APPRENTICESHIP BILL 24 March 1823 - The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 5 Speeches and Evidence

Return to Title Page for The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 5 Speeches and Evidence

MERCHANT VESSELS APPRENTICESHIP BILL 24 March 1823 - David Ricardo, The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 5 Speeches and Evidence [1819]

Edition used:

The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. Piero Sraffa with the Collaboration of M.H. Dobb (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005). Vol. 5 Speeches and Evidence 1815-1823.

Part of: The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols (Sraffa ed.)

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


MERCHANT VESSELS APPRENTICESHIP BILL
24 March 1823

The report of this bill [cp. above, p. 273] being brought up,

Mr. Ricardo said, he objected altogether to the principle of the bill. He thought it was a maxim, that no person ought to be controlled in his own arrangements, unless such control was rendered necessary by paramount political circumstances. Now, no such necessity could be shown in support of this bill. In his opinion, it would not be more unjust to enact a law, that every surgeon should take a certain number of apprentices, to encourage the progress of surgical science, than it would be to pass this bill, rendering it imperative on the masters of merchant vessels to take a given number of apprentices, in order to encourage the increase of efficient seamen. He denied that this bill would cause an addition of one seaman to the number now in the service. So long as there was employment for seamen, there would be encouragement enough for them; and when there was not, those who were now here, would resort to foreign countries for employ. The only effect of the bill would be, to reduce the wages of seamen; and that alone would render it objectionable. He would move, to leave out from the word “repealed,” to the end of the bill, his object being, to remove the compulsory condition for taking a certain number of apprentices from the bill.

The House divided: for Ricardo’s amendment, 6; against it, 85.

  • List of the Minority
  • Bennet, hon. H. G.
  • Grenfell, Pascoe
  • Smith, Robert
  • Sykes, D.
  • Whitmore, W. W.
  • Wyvill, M.
  • Tellers
  • Ricardo, D.
  • Hume, J.

[See further, p. 282.]