Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAP. IV.: The East-India Trade does not so much diminish the Riches of some private Persons, as it increases the Riches of the Kingdom. - A Select Collection of Early English Tracts on Commerce from the Originals of Mun, Roberts, North, and Others

Return to Title Page for A Select Collection of Early English Tracts on Commerce from the Originals of Mun, Roberts, North, and Others

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Subject Area: Economics

CHAP. IV.: The East-India Trade does not so much diminish the Riches of some private Persons, as it increases the Riches of the Kingdom. - John Ramsay McCulloch, A Select Collection of Early English Tracts on Commerce from the Originals of Mun, Roberts, North, and Others [1856]

Edition used:

A Select Collection of Early English Tracts on Commerce from the Originals of Mun, Roberts, North, and Others, with a Preface and Index (London: Printed for the Political Economy Club, 1856).

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAP. IV.

The East-India Trade does not so much diminish the Riches of some private Persons, as it increases the Riches of the Kingdom.

An Objection, That as much Value of English Manufacture is destroy’d, as is imported of Indian Manufactures. AGAIN, it is objected against this Trade, If the same is an Exchange of less for greater value, yet the Kingdom, the Body of the People is not the richer for this Exchange. The East-India Trade procures Manufactures at less Price, and by less Labour than the like wou’d be made in England; perhaps as much value at the price of one Shilling, and consequently by one Man’s Labour, as will be made here by three, and for the price of three Shillings. But then two are depriv’d of their Employments; for every one brought from India, so much English Manufacture is destroy’d: the East-India Trade does the Work with fewer Hands, but then no more is done. Few do the Business of many, but then the rest are forc’d to stand still; few possess themselves of all the Riches, and leave nothing for the rest of the People. Thus the Riches of the Kingdom are not greater, they are only translated into fewer Hands; what is gain’d by the exchange of Bullion for a better thing, is lost again by the loss of so much English Manufacture. Wherefore, tho’ indeed the Exchange is for greater Value, yet all the Benefit is to private Persons; many others are undone; the Body of the People is not the richer, the Kingdom is not enrich’d.

To this Objection may be answer’d,The same is Answer’d. If the Riches of the Kingdom by this Trade are only translated into fewer Hands, if they are not greater, yet they are not less for this Translation. Of an 100l. the Value is the same, whether collected into the Hands of few, or distributed into the Hands of many. The same quantity of Silk, or Cloth, or Callico, or other Manufacture, will cloath as many Backs, the Value of ’em will feed as many Bellies, whether procur’d by the Labour of one, or by the equal Labour of three. If the same Work is done by one, which was done before by three; if the other two are forc’d to sit still, the Kingdom got nothing before by the Labour of the two, and therefore loses nothing by their sitting still. And thus if the Riches of the Kingdom are not greater, they are not less for being procur’d by fewer Hands. Nevertheless, this is not an Answer to the Objection, That tho’ the Exchange is profitable to private Persons, yet the Kingdom is not the richer for it.

Therefore certainly the publick Stock must be increast. If one Man procures as much Value by his Labour from India, as three produc’d before in England: if one Man does the Work of three, his Riches are increas’d, he possesses as much as all the three before. The Riches of the other two are not reduc’d to nothing; perhaps their Labour is less valuable, yet still it is worth something; and whatsoever it is worth is Gain to the Kingdom. The Riches of one are as great as of all the three before, those of the other two are not reduc’d to nothing: And thus the increase of the Stock of a Part exceeding the diminution of that of the rest of the People, must be esteem’d an increase of the Riches of the whole People. If any English Manufactures are destroy’d by the Importation of those of the East-Indies, yet still there is left Employment for the People; and thus the Exchange of Bullion for Indian Manufactures is not only profitable to those that make it, but also to the Kingdom.

Whence it may be concluded, that notwithstanding the Emulation of two Companies, and the Influence of that upon the prices of things both here and in the East-Indies; notwithstanding the loss of some English Manufactures by the Importation of like and cheaper things from India, yet still the Trade with that Country is an Exchange of Bullion for Manufactures more valuable than those equivalent of so much Bullion; of Bullion for Manufactures that may be exchang’d for more; of less of the secondary for more of the principal Riches than are otherwise to be had upon the same Terms, is consequently an exchange of less for greater Value. And this may serve for a first Answer to the Exportation of our Bullion.