Front Page Titles (by Subject) CHAPTER II.: STATE OF JURY PACKAGE IN SCOTLAND. - The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 5 (Scotch Reform, Real Property, Codification Petitions)
CHAPTER II.: STATE OF JURY PACKAGE IN SCOTLAND. - Jeremy Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 5 (Scotch Reform, Real Property, Codification Petitions) 
The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1838-1843). 11 vols. Vol. 5.
About Liberty Fund:
Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.
The text is in the public domain.
Fair use statement:
This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
- Scotch Reform; Considered With Reference to the Plan Proposed In the Late Parliament, For the Regulation of the Courts and the Administration of Justice In Scotland: With Illustrations From English Non-reform: In the Course of Which, Divers Imperfectio
- Letters to Lord Grenville, On the Proposed Reform In the Administration of Civil Justice In Scotland.
- Letter I.
- Letter II.: Proposed Division of the Court of Session.
- Letter III.: Proposed System of Pleading.
- Letter IV.: Proposed Trial By Jury.
- Letter V.: On the Bill Called Lord Eldon’s.
- Summary View of the Plan of a Judicatory, Under the Name of the Court of Lords’ Delegates, Proposed For the Exercise of Those Judicial Functions, the Adequate Discharge of Which By the Whole House Has, For These Six Or Seven Years, Been Rendered Confe
- The Elements of the Art of Packing, As Applied to Special Juries, Particularly In Cases of Libel Law.
- Advertisement to the First Edition.
- Part I.
- Chapter I.: Occasion of This Work.
- Chapter II.: Juries—their Use As a Check to Judges.
- Chapter III.: The Check How Done Away By Influence.
- Chapter IV.: Special Juries, a Special Engine of Corruption.
- Chapter V.: Jury Unanimity Increases the Corruption.
- Chapter VI.: Purposes to Which Influence On Juries May Be Made Subservient.
- Chapter VII.: Chief Purpose, Crushing the Liberty of the Press.
- Chapter VIII.: The Exchequer Packing Office Suffices.
- Chapter IX.: Instruments For Crushing the Liberty of the Press.
- Chapter X.: Want of Adequate Obsequiousness Morally Impossible.
- Chapter XI.: Such Juries Worse Than None.
- Part II.: State of the Packing System, Anno 1808.
- Chapter I.: Introduction—two Reforming Shrievalties.
- Chapter II.: The Sheriff to the Lord Chief Baron—notices.
- Chapter III.: Lord Chief Baron to Sheriff Sir Richard Phillips—avowries and Defences.
- Chapter IV.: Observations On the Lord Chief Baron’s Defences.
- Chapter V.: Special Jury Corruption—devices By Which It Was Protected.
- Chapter VI.: Learned Advice From the Temple.
- Chapter VII.: Advice From Lincoln’s-inn.
- Chapter VIII.: Maxims Concerning Reform, Deduced From the Above Letter.
- Chapter IX.: Transactions At the Remembrancer’s.
- Part III.: State of the Packing System, Anno 1809.
- Chapter I.: Commons’ Debate, 24 Th April 1809. Packing and Cutting.
- Chapter II.: Double-fee Abuse, Plain and Embroidered.
- Part IV.—: Remedies Proposed. *
- Chapter I.: Humble Proposal For Restoring the Constitution In Regard to Juries.
- Chapter II.: State of Jury Package In Scotland.
- Chapter III.: Humble Proposal For Restoring the Authority of Parliament.
- “swear Not At All:” Containing an Exposure of the Needlessness and Mischievousness, As Well As Anti-christianity of the Ceremony of an Oath: a View of the Parliamentary Recognition of Its Needlessness, Implied In the Practice of Both Houses; a
- Editor’s Note
- Swear Not At All. Mat. V. 34.
- Section 1.: Oath. Incongruity of the Assumption, On Which Its Supposed Beneficial Efficiency Is Grounded.
- Section 2.: Mischievousness of This Instrument Considered In a General Point of View.
- Section 3.: Its Inefficiency In the Character of a Security Against Deceptious Incorrectness and Incompleteness In Evidence.
- Section 4.: Recognition of Its Inutility By Lords and Commons.
- Section 5.: Mischiefs —1. Contributing to the Mendacity-licence Granted By Judges.
- Section 6.: Mischief 2— Weakening In Various Ways the Efficiency of the Laws.
- Section 7.: Mischief 3— Bewildering and Enslaving the Consciences of Jurymen.
- Section 8.: Mischief 4— Giving Aid and Force to the Enterprises of Malefactors.
- Section 9.: Mischief 5— Furnishing Pretence For Misrule By Abuse of Prerogative.
- Section 10.: Misrule, How to Perpetuate—coronation Oaths Amended.
- Section 11.: Mischief 6— Corrupting the National Morals and Understanding—oxford University Oaths.
- Section 12.: Mischief 6 Continued. —ii. Cambridge Oaths.
- Section 13.: Practice of Receiving Judicial Oaths, Its Repugnancy to the Precepts of Jesus.
- Section 14.: Succedanea—true Securities Substitutible to This False One.
- Section 15.: Cause and Origin of the Practice In Regard to Oaths.
- Truth Versus Ashhurst; Or, Law As It Is, Contrasted With What It Is Said to Be.
- The King Against Edmonds and Others: Set Down For Trial, At Warwick, On the 29 Th of March 1820.
- The King Against Sir Charles Wolseley, Baronet, and Joseph Harrison, Schoolmaster, Set Down For Trial, At Chester, On the 4 Th of April 1820.
- Official Aptitude Maximized; Expense Minimized: As Shown In the Several Papers Comprised In This Volume.
- Paper I.—
- Paper II.—: Introductory View, &c.
- Paper III.—: Extract From the Proposed Constitutional Code; Entitled, Official Aptitude Maximized—expense Minimized. By Jeremy Bentham, Esq. Bencher of Lincoln’s Inn.
- Paper IV.—: Supplement to the Above Extract.
- Paper V.—: Defence of Economy Against the Right Honourable Edmund Burke.
- Paper VI.—: Defence of Economy Against the Right Honourable George Rose.
- Paper VII.: Observations On Mr. Secretary Peel’s House of Commons Speech, 21 St March 1825, Introducing His Police Magistrates’ Salary Raising Bill, ( Date of Order For Printing, 24 Th March 1825.)
- Paper VIII.: Indications Respecting Lord Eldon, Including History of the Pending Judges’-salary-raising Measure.
- Paper IX.—: On the Militia.
- Paper X.: On Public Account Keeping.
- Paper XI.: Constitutional Code—table of Contents As Shown By Titles of Chapter and Sections.
- Commentary On Mr. Humphreys’ Real Property Code, By Jeremy Bentham. From the Westminster Review, No. XII., For October 1826.
- *∗* the Following Note Was Prefixed to the Article By the Editor of the Westminster Review: —
- Commentary On Humphreys’ Real Property Code.
- I.: Deed of Sale.
- II.: Deed of Mortgage. 1
- III.: Marriage Settlement Deed.
- Outline of a Plan of a General Register of Real Property: Contained In a Communication to the Commissioners Appointed Under Letters Patent, of Date the 6 Th June 1828, to Inquire Into the Law of England Respecting Real Property, and First Printed I
- Justice and Codification Petitions: Being Forms Proposed For Signature By All Persons Whose Desire It Is to See Justice No Longer Sold, Delayed, Or Denied: and to Obtain a Possibility of That Knowledge of the Law, In Proportion to the Want of Which T
- Justice and Codification Petitions.
- Preliminary Explanations Necessary to Be First Read.
- Petition For Justice.
- Abridged Petition For Justice.
- More Abridged Petition For Justice.
- Supplement, Which May Be Added Or Not to Any One of the Three Or Any Other Proposed Petition.
- Petition For Codification.
- Lord Brougham Displayed: Including I. Boa Constrictor, Alias Helluo Curiarum; II. Observations On the Bankruptcy Court Bill, Now Ripened Into an Act; III. Extracts From Proposed Constitutional Code.
STATE OF JURY PACKAGE IN SCOTLAND.
On this head much stands expressed in a few words.
Extract from an anonymous pamphlet published on the occasion of the Scotch judiciary reform, under the title of Reflections on the Administration of Civil Justice in Scotland, &c.: Edinburgh, for Blackwood; London, for Longman & Co. 1806—page 88, note:—
“The mode of appointing juries in criminal cases is most improper. The sheriff may return forty-five men chosen by him at pleasure; the judge may select any fifteen of them to compose the jury; peremptory challenges are unknown. Is it not obvious that these two officers have the fate of a prisoner often in their hands?—in other words, that they can return what is termed in England a packed jury? Nothing should be left in criminal cases to the discretion of persons over whom the crown is always likely to have influence; and therefore it is much to be wished that a clause should be introduced in the bill, which is to be founded on the resolutions, in order to regulate the appointment of juries in criminal cases.”
If, in the statement thus made by an anonymous, though not altogether an unknown hand, there be a syllable of truth—and by known, and well-informed and trust-worthy informants, I am assured that it is correctly true—the packing system has in that kingdom been carried to a pitch of perfection equal in efficiency at least, if not in dexterity, to that which it has attained in England, and this not only where personal liberty alone, but where life and everything else, is at stake. If, in the whole population of that kingdom, electors and elected, there be a human being fit for anything better than to serve as a tool in the chest belonging to Lord Melville, or a commissioner in the committee of reform, headed and characterized by that name, behold an occasion for him to show himself.