Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow Letter from Col. Robert Hammond. - The Clarke Papers. Selections from the Papers of William Clarke, vol. 1

Return to Title Page for The Clarke Papers. Selections from the Papers of William Clarke, vol. 1

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Subject Area: Political Theory
Subject Area: History
Topic: The English Revolution

Letter from Col. Robert Hammond. - Sir William Clarke, The Clarke Papers. Selections from the Papers of William Clarke, vol. 1 [1901]

Edition used:

The Clarke Papers. Selections from the Papers of William Clarke, Secretary to the Council of the Army, 1647-1649, and to General Monck and the Commanders of the Army in Scotland, 1651-1660, ed. C.H. Firth (Camden Society, 1901). 4 vols.

Part of: The Clarke Papers. Selections from the Papers of William Clarke, 4 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


Letter from Col. Robert Hammond.

The Kinge stands engaged in his worde nott to stirr, and doth protest this is the place hee first designed when hee apprehended it not safe to continue longer at Hampton Court, and that if hee were to chuse anie place within his three Kingdoms hee would not remove hence except to London upon a personall treaty. I have often asked that if hee bee not thought safe here hee may be removed, which is the thing most desirable to mee.

[Ro. Hamond.a ]

APPENDIX.

APPENDIX A.

Colonel Wogan’s Narrative.

The following narrative is a continuation of a paper printed by Carte under the heading, “The Proceedings of the new-moulded Army from the time they were brought together in 1645 till the King’s going to the Isle of Wight in 1647. Written by Col. Edward Wogan, till then an officer of that Army.”1 Carte unfortunately printed only half of Wogan’s narrative, stopping short at the battle of Torrington in February, 1646; the remainder, beginning where Carte leaves off, is printed from the original in the Clarendon State Papers (No. 2607). A sketch of Wogan’s life will help to determine the value of his statements. Of his early career little is known, but it may be safely assumed that he is the Captain Wogan of Okey’s dragoons mentioned in the list of the New Model. In March, 1648, he deserted, and succeeded in marching to Scotland with the whole of his troop (Rushworth, vii., 1021-4, 1031). His surrender was vainly demanded by the Parliament (ibid. 1046, 1064-6). Clarendon, who devotes some pages to an account of Wogan, mistakenly places his desertion after the King’s execution (Rebellion, xiv., 59-61). Later he joined Ormonde in Ireland, was appointed governor of Duncannon and successfully repulsed an attack by Ireton (Carte, Ormonde, ii, 97).

In December, 1649, when Col. Sankey defeated Lieut.-Gen. Ferrall, Wogan was taken prisoner, but escaped by corrupting his gaoler (Carlyle’s Cromwell, Letter cxvii.; Whitelocke, Memorials, f. 426). Had he not escaped Cromwell intended to execute him as a renegade and traitor, “who did not only betray his trust in England but counterfeited the General’s hand (thereby to carry his men, whom he had seduced, into a foreign nation to invade England), under whom he had taken pay and from whose service he was not discharged; and with the same nation did invade England and hath since, contrary to the said trust, taken up arms here” (Carlyle’s Cromwell, Appendix 16). In 1653 Wogan boldly landed in England from France, enlisted fifty or sixty men for the King’s service, marched from London to Scotland pretending they were soldiers of the Commonwealth, and joined Middleton and the royalists who were holding out in the Highlands (Cal. Clarendon Papers, ii., 286, 288; History of the Rebellion, xiv., 59). Soon after joining Middleton he was severely wounded in an obscure skirmish, died for want of a good surgeon, and was buried at the Kirk of Kenmore in February, 1654 (Military Memoirs of John Gwynne, 1822, pp. 220, 224, 237, 239, 243, 248, 253).

“We were soone enformed of that from Ireland by a small frigott that came into Padstow that was sent by my Lord of Woster, with letters to the Prince. The frigate came in wth that confidence being assured the place was within the King’s quarters, theire men came on shore without asking anything of the Inhabytantes who was quartered theire by chance; some of or horsemen being in that towne examined the men and found them to be Ireish, wch presently confessed they came from Waterford in Ireland, they seized upon the seamen and got abord, the frigott being run aground there, the[y] tooke one Captain Allen wch had the command of the vessell, him with a packett was brought to Bodman to or Generall. By those letters we understood that there was noe daunger of any Foote coming out of Ireland, for in those letters was mencioned the want of Shipping and moneys before any Foote could be had from thence, then there was noe other feare then that of France and to prevent that daunger there was order sent to Admirall Batten to hover from the Land’s End to the Coast of Brittany; then or Generall resolved to advance towards Trurowe; in or march the first day from Bodman or forlorne of Horse encountred wth a partie of the Enimies wch were commanded by Major Generall Web, both parties mett and fought nobly. At last the King’s partie being over numbred was forst to give ground and leave the field in some disorder; only the Major Generall himselfe charged wth an undaunted curage through all our partie and in charging back agayne his horse was killed and himself wounded in severall piaces wth all those that stuck to him either slayne or taken, he being at last after a long fight on foote forst to submitt. The second day we mett with theire Commissioners that came to treate which was very strange to us all, yet or Generall would not heare of a Treaty till he came to Trewrowe where the King’s Army then lay. First it was agreed that the King’s Army should draw back westward from Trurow and that ors should quarter there. Allsoe it was agreed that theire should be a seasasion of armes for six days, dureing wch tyme the Commissioners of both Armies were to sitt att Trurow to agree upon the Articles; for all this or Generall had noe greate confidence in this treaty feareing least the King’s Army should slip by them as they might easily doe, but to prevent that daunger he sent some horse and Dragoones back agayne to Bodman wth an order that all the trees should be cut downe behind Bodman bridge and in all the Cuntry thereabouts to stopp the King’s horse if they came that way, in two or three dayes. That doubt was cleared, for or Commissioners and theires agreed thus: First that the King’s Army should disband and theire Souldiers leaveing theire horse should retourne to theire severall homes, and the Officers to march to theire severall homes wth theire horses and armes. The King’s Army were to lay downe theire armes by Brigade on severall dayes till theire was a Regement of or horse that convoyed them away to theire severall cuntryes. When all the King’s Army was disbanded there was nothing more for or Army to doe in those partes; a Councell of Warr was called and it was thought fitt that the Army should march towards Exeter and that Collonel Fortesque should stay in that Cuntry with two Regements of Foote and 3 Troopes of horse for the takeing in of Pendenis and the Mount. Or Generall with the rest of the Army came before Exetter, the Governor thereof, which was Sir John Berkley, seeing or Army come before it and knowing that the King’s Army was disbanded with all the nessecity he was reduced unto for want of provisions and with all that they had noe hopes of releefe, hee was forst to surrender the Citty upon honorable condicions; soe was Bastable deliver’d upon the same condicions; all or horse were sent towards Oxford under the command of Commissary Generall Ireton, our Generall with the Lieutenant Generall stay with all the foote at Exeter to refresh them awhile. The Commissary lay wth all the horse round Oxford and continually on duty, for the Kinge was then in the Cytty with Prince Rupert wth a considerable party of horse as we heard, who were resolved to fall out upon some of our quarters, wch made us all every night to expect their coming.

After the generall had settled the businesse of the west he marched wth all the foote towards Oxford. Before he came within three or fower dayes march of that Cytty the Kinge gott out privately in the night only wth two or three persons wth him.April 27th, 1646. It was told the Comissary generall that the Kinge was gone for London, and was invited thither by the Presbiterian party of the House and Cytty, and was encouraged to it by the Scotts army that lay then before Newarke. I knowe not whether that report was true or noe, but I am sure that was the first pretended cause of jelousey that was betwene the Independant and Presbyterian party, and to make the army the more assured of this report it was credibly said that the King came first to London and was conveyed from thence to the Scotts army. This bred noe small division betwixt the Presbiterian and Independant officers of the army. The generall came up with the foote before Oxford, and placed them as conveniently as hee could, as above the horse and Major Generall Massey’s Brigade was to lye about Farington. We continued soe for the space of a moneth and the foote entrencht Themselves a good distance from the Towne. Collonell Whaley wth his regimt of horse and 2 regmts of foote was sente to block up Woster wth the assistance of Collonell Morgan the governr of Glossester. It was just at that tyme the black lyst was presented to the Lent Generall, wch was the names of all those officers in the army that were Presbiterians. It was brought privately and presented by Lieutent generall Wattson, wch was a most pernitious factious fellow. He was backed by many of the cheefest of the Army and partly1 by the Comissary generall. The Generall was ignorant of it, and knew not what it meant when one Major Fincher Quarter Mr Generall of the Horse discovered it unto him, and told him of what daungerous consequence (sic) would be if this liste came to the knowledg of those officers whose names were written in it. The generall made answer that for his parte he made noe differance of theire opinions but was confident that all his officrs were faythfull to the Parliamt, and that the Lieut Generall as he conceived would not doe any thing to the prejudice of any man that wisht well to the Parliamt or Army. The Qr Mr Generall was noe way satisfied wth this answer but was resolved to acquaint his frends in the Parliamt House, wth this liste and of the new order that was given out by the Leut Generall, wch was Liberty of Conscience as they caled it to all that pretend to have the guift of the spiritt in preaching or expounding. Both houses tooke this soe haynously that their was an order sente to or generall that none should preach or teach in the Army but those that are lawfully called to it by the Assembly of Divines. This order was no sooner come but executed, but to the greate greefe of the Leut. Generall and his faction; yet they desembled the matter soe well that they seemed to take noe notice of it at present. In the meane while the seige went on, and the towne being streightned for provisions yet obstinate would not surrender. There were not those wanting in or Army that spred abroade that the king wth the Scots army would releeve that Cytty, and that the Presbiterian party of the Houses of Lords and Commons would invite him to it. Many papers to this purpose were spred abroade amongst the soldyers, but to noe effect, for the Presbiterians had much the stronger parte in the army; beside Major Generall Massie’s brigade would back them upon any ocasion to that purpose. Collonell Raynsburrow was sent wth two regmts of horse and two of foote to strengthen the seige of Woster that was but slightly blockt up before by Collonell Whaley. Whaly was called back to the seige of Oxford, he being then accounted a Presbiterian. At last necessity compelled the Cytty to treate. Comissonrs were ordered on both sides: after long debate they agreed and the Cytty was surrendred upon honorable condicions, soe was Woster, Farington and Wallingford, and allsoe Ragland that was beseiged by foote of ours sente from the seige of Oxford: our army having then noethinge to doe were sent to quarters, some to Wales, some to the Associate Countyes, another pte were quartered about Wostershere, Oxfordshere, and Herifordshere. Major Generall Massie’s brigade were sente to Dorsetshere, Somrstshere and Wiltshere to quarter. The first of Crumwell’s stratagems was to get the Major Generall’s brigade to disband under pretence to ease the Kingdom, though they offered theire service to Ireland and would willingly have gone wth that moneys they had at theire disbanding, but Crumwell prevented theire desires and spoake openly in the House that he would carry as many of the new modled army to that Kingdom as the Parliamt thought fitt and that he would disband the rest if they pleased. This motion of his tooke off all jealousey from Crumwell and the rest of the army: presently order was given for Massie’s men to disband, wch was presently done. Presently after happened the suddayne death of the Earle of Essex, wch Cromwell tooke soe much to hearte in his outward apperance that he was seene by some to cry and tear his hayre, though it was judged by many that hee contrived his death; at this tyme the King was at Newcastle wth the Scotts, his frends dayly resorting thither, wch gave greate cause of suspition of the Scotts and credibly confirmed in our army that the Scotts would declare for the Kinge. To prevent further danger there were two regmts of horse and Oakey’s dragoons sent to quarter all along upon the River Trent; and to examin all that came that way Northwards. At last we’re freed from that feare, for the Scotts were resolved to deliver up the King as soone as they had received an hundred thousand pounds, and soe leave the kingdome. Theire money was conveyed downe to them by Colonell Graves; there went alsoe wth him Commissionrs from both houses that went to receive the Kinge, and to pay the money to the Scotts. The King was dellivered to the custody of Collonell Graves: the Scotts marched for their owne cuntry, and the Kinge was brought to Holmeby, there kept wth a strong guarde about him and none of his old frends suffered to come unto him except those that had leave from or Commissionrs. The Commissionrs made divers propositions to the King, but not pleaseing to him. Crumwell all this whille sate in the House, and both Houses ordered that the most parte of the army should disband or goe for Ireland except those that were to stay in the kingdome as a standing armie, wch was to be all Presbyterians. Crumwell seemed to be as forward for this as any in the House; or head Quarters was then at Nottingham. Commissary Ireton all this while was not ignorant what the Parliamt was resolved to doe, and at councell of warr tooke ocasion to speake of this; how the Parliamt had noe good intentions towards the army, and that it was a sad reward for we many yeares service to be cast of wthout any reward for their service or security for their persons after they were disbanded: likewise that the Parliamt was resolved to set upp the King agayne, that there would be noe liveing for any in that kingedome that had served in our army. All the officrs that were present were much moved at this and besought the Commissary to advise them what they were to doe. He answered there was noe way but one to prevent this, wch was that every officer should repayre to his respective command, and to send a trooper of each troope wth the grievances of the severall troopes to Saffron Walden, where the Generall was then goeing to receive the Commissionrs of both Houses that were coming downe to disband the Army. The Parliament thought none soe fitt as Crumwell to be one of those Commissionrs. The Commissionrs came to Saffron Walden; all the officrs of the army were to meete there wth the names of all those that will engage for the service of Ireland: there likewise came a trooper of each troope wth theire severall greevances. When they were all come to towne, they were called privately together by Capt John Reynolds of Cromwell’s Regiment and one his greatest favorete: when the troope mett together the Capt made them a long and plesant speech, told them how they were like to be cast of wthout any manr of reward for theire greate services, and that they had noe courage nor honr that would be soe, and that for his pte he and all his troope would sooner dye then disband wthout the utmost farthing of theire arreares. This speech tooke soe well wth these troopers that they highly comended his brave resolution and were all of his opinion. When the Capt. perceived that his speech found such good successe, desired them all to sitt downe and consider what they had to doe, and for his parte if they pleased he would sitt wth them and doe nothing wthout theire consent, wch they gladly accepted of, and gave theire Capt. the title of Chayreman. The first thing they did was to dispatch messengers to every regimt and troope in the army to let thom know what the Parliament was resolved to doe and what they for theire pte were resolved to propose to the Commissonrs and further desired that every troope should owne what theire deputyes should propose to the Comissionrs to be theire sense and desire, wch was accordingly granted by allmost every troope in the army. Our generall comanded that all our officers should meete in the greate Church at Saffron Walden to heare what the Comissonrs had to say unto us. The Generall wth the Commissonrs came to the Church, wch was allmost full; the General made a shorte speech, tould us how much the Parliamt and Kingdom were obliged to us for our faythfull services, and desired them that would goe for Ireland to give in theire names: and that they first should have security for theire arreares. Then Crumwell stoode up and made a long grave speech in the behalf of the Parliamt, first to give the army thanks for theire never to be forgotten services, as allsoe what a greate care the Parliament had to please each particular man according to his particuler meritt, and that the Parliamt would in tyme pay the arreares of those that were to stay in the Kingdom, and give security for the payment of those that were to goe for Ireland, and protested for his parte that if the Parliamt would command him he would gladly trayle a picke in that war of Ireland, therefore desired us all to consider what a holy war that was, and that it were a noble thing for all us that were young men to engage for that kingdom. Just whilst he was thus speaking he was interrupted by one of the troopers that was of Raynolds his Councell, wch had newly called themselves Agitators; the fellow spoake boldly to the Leut Generall and told him that he was employed thither by the Army to acquaynt the Generall and the Comissrs of theire agreevance, and to that purpose prsented a remonstrance in the behalfe of the Army, wch startled the Commissonrs and the Generall himselfe, and Crumwell tooke on like a madman, and declared openly in the Church that all those that had a hand in that remonstrance were enimies to the Parliamt. Many of or Officers were surprised at his saying, but not the Chayreman of the Agitators, wch was Capt Raynolds. He seemed to be the more confident in his request. The remonstrance was soe unreasonable that the Comissonrs would not grant anything that was desired in it: the officrs were all dismist to theire severall comands. Crumwell and the rest of the Comissrs retorned to London to give the Parliamt an account. Crumwell in his pretended fury protested the ruen of all those that had a hand in that remonstrance. Ireton seemed to be a neuter and would not openly owne the remonstrance, nor seeme to contest wth the Parliamt. The Chayreman of the Agitators was not idle, but sent allwayes to the Troop[e]s to let them know what a sad condicion they were if they did not owne that remonstrance, and the proceedings of the Agitators. The Generall was ignorant of these contrivances and certaynely persuaded by Ireton that these that were called Agitators intended nothing to his prejudice nor to the dishonr of the army, yet the General, the Comissary Generall, and all the Officrs of the Army disavowed the proceedings of the Agitators. Ireton designed the matter, what he would have the army to doe, and privately would send it to London to Crumwell Crumwell would with as much privacie send it back agayne to his Capt. Reynolds, the Chayreman Raynolds would present it to the Agitatrs as the greevance of the Army, they would declare it to the Parliament as the desire of the Army, soe that all things were done and acted in that Councell of what concerned the Army wthout the Generalls order or any other Officrs of the army. The Parliament was much ofended at this and writt to the generall to appease that mutinie as they called it, and to apprehend such officrs as had a hand in that mutinie, that the Generall would be pleased to send up Capt Reynolds to them, he being, as they conceived, the cheefe instrument of what was past. The Generall tooke this letter with consideracion and advised wth Ireton about it. Whilst the matter was in debate whether Reynolds should be sent or noe, the Kinge was taken away from Holmebey by a partie of five hundred horse under the comand of Cornet Joyce. Those that had the guarde of the King condecended to his takeing away, I meane all the comon souldrs. Collonell Graves that had the comand of the King at that tyme was forst to fly away privately, for all his whole regmt mutined agt him. He and Sr Robert Pye came post to London to advertise the Parliamt of what was happened, then or Generall sent to the Parlemt to let them know how parte of the army tooke away the Kinge he then knew not where, and that the rest of the army would mutinie, and protested his inocency in the proceedings of the army and taking away the king. This put both Houses into a strange feare soe that they knew not what to doe or say in the matter. Now Crumwell foamed and stormed, vowed that if the Parliament would comand him he doubted not but in a shorte tyme he would destroy all the mutiners there. He protested before God openly before the Houses that he would never leave them nor forsake them whilst he lived. The House seemed much satisfied wth Crumwell’s solemne protestation and began to consider how he might appease this mutiny. Crumwell, that very afternoone stole out of Towne and posted downe to the army. As soone as he came, the first thing he did was to owne what the Agitatrs had done and the takeing away of the king to be his design. Our Generall was amased at his sayings, but Crumwell and Ireton perswaded him that there was a nessesity for it, and that it was for theire owne safety. First they made it appe to him that the Parliamt had a designe to ruen the army, and that they would close with the King and leave the army in the lurch to theire greate dishonr and utter ruen: by much adoe they perswaded the Generall to be of theire opinion and moreover perswaded him to send his declaracion to that purpose to the Parliamt, which accordingly he did. The Parliament was astonished at it, and had they not been encouraged by the Cytty of London that assured them they would live and dye with them.1 The Parliamt set forth theire declaration against the army and declared all those to be traitors that had a hand in takeing away of the Kinge. They further declared that all those officrs and soldrs that would come of from the army to London should have six moneths’ pay in hand and security for theire arrers, and that they should continue in the standing army that should be in the Kingdom. This declaracion wrought soe much in the army that it brought of many both officrs and souldrs, first Coll. Graves, Coll. Herbert, Coll. Fortescue, Sr Robt Pye, Coll. Sheffield, Coll. Buttler, Quarter Mr Generall Fincher, the Generall’s Leut Collonell of foot and many Capts and other Officrs and souldrs came away upon this declaration to London; without doubt all the rest would have followed, had it not bene for Crumwells subtilty, wch was his outward good carriage to the King wch was then in the army. It was given out in the army by Crumwell’s permission that as the Parliamt would reinthrowne the King wthout making condicions for the souldrs soe would the army reinthrowne the King wthout makeing condicions for the Parliament. It was at that very tyme the Presbiterians lost all theire interest in the army, by reason all those officrs they had most confidence in had now deserted the army and were gone to London, wch had they not done, Crumwell and Ireton could never have brought theire designe to passe, nor ever have gayned soe much interest in the army as presently after they had, by reason that all those that deserted the army their comands were voyd and given to the most factious that could be found. The Parliamt were preparing of an army, the caviler party in London were joyneing wth them. On the other side Crumwell endevored to oblige all the Kings frends and thought it the nearest way first to make the King his frende, wch he did by his great protestacions and oathes upon his knees privately before the Kinge that he and the whole army would declare for him; and to give the greater assurance of his faythfulnesse gave order that all those that were the King’s old frends might freely com to him without any kinde of examining, that his old servants might attend him, that there should be noe distinctive mark betwene the army and those that were formerly of the King’s and comanded all the officrs to entertayne as many of them as came to or army: the King was likewise without any guarde of the army, and suffered to goe for his pleasure wheresoever he desired. The King’s frends at London could not well tell wch side to take: for the Parliamt profest as much for the King as the Army could doe, but they haveing not much confidence in the Parliamt sent downe a gent of quallity to the King to receive his comands. The gent that came to the Kinge, as I take it, was Sr Marmiduke Langdon, who was sent back to London, wth command to those of the King’s frends not to medle nor engage wth the Parliamt in London. The Presbiterians in London were quite dishartened when they saw the Kings’ party leave them. The Cyty would not advance any money for the levying of a new army. The Parliament at that tyme had noe money in their treasury; our army came towards London and sent theire propositions to the Parliament, first to demaund eleven of theire members to put into the hands of the army; next that the Parliamt should own all the proceedings of the army. The Parliament thought themselves soe much undervalued in these unreasonable demaunds that they would by noe meanes condescend to anythinge that the army desired. Still the army came on, and the Parliamt not being provided to defend themselves, the Cytty not willing to engage in a new warr, as they conceived that to be, being much discouraged at the Speaker’s stealeing away wth thirty Lords and Commons; presently after the Speaker of the House of Lords went away allsoe to the army, with divers of the principall cyttezens of London. Those of the Parliamt that stayd behind were all in a confusion, and knew not well what to doe by reason the Cytty gave them quite over, and would have noething to doe wth them, nor would not doe soe much as maynetayne theire lyne to make condicions for themselves, but suffered the army to march through the Cyty without any maner of opposition. When we came on the other side of the Cytty or Generall demaunded the Tower wch was presently given him. Or army marched to Croyden, the King was sent to Hampton Court wth a small guarde. When Crumwell was possest of the Tower, Guildehall and Whitehall, the first thinge he did was to command the Cyttyzens to pull downe all the lyne and fortefications about the Cytty, wch was accordingly done wth greate humillity and reverence. Then the Parliamt sate agayne, I meane those members that came downe to the Army. The first thing they did after they sate was to owne all that the Parliamt did this tyme past, and ordered that the Army should have six moneths’ pay payd them out of hand, wch was borrowed of the Cytty, and presently payd to the soldrs. The army was then sent to quarters wth an order to disband all those amongst us that were of the King’s party. Coll. Whaley was sent wth his Regimt to guarde the Kinge at Hampton Court. The Generall removed his quarters to Puttney where he stayed till the Kinge was cuningly jugled away to the Isle of Wight, and soe presently after I marcht away into Scotland wth my troope.

APPENDIX B.

The examination of the three troopers who delivered the letter of the soldiers to Major General Skippon, April 30, 1647.

[Tanner MSS. Bodleian Library, vol. lviii., f. 84.]

The Gentlemen that delivered the letter were call’d in, vizt.

  • Mr. Edw. Sexby.
  • Mr. Wm. Allin.
  • Mr. Tho. Shepherd.

They brought and delivered a letter to Major Generall Skippon, the like to the Lieutenant Generall, and the like to His Excellencie.

By what authoritie

The joynt and unanimous consent of the Eight Regiments of Horse, they having attested it by two of every Regiment. They mett at severall places.

They had noe Rendevous but what wee had by our Officers.

Brought by our Officers [sic] each Regiment to a Rendezvous.

The Proposicions for the service of Ireland read.

They did know the contents of the letter else they would not have subscribed it. It was read in each Regiment and each Troope and subscribed. The originall is with the Regiments. This but a faire copie. There was an originall with each Troupe.

Ordered,

That the Sergeant doe keepe these persons asunder upon their Examinacions and after they are examined.

Mr. Allen,

How long hee had been in the Armie, a twelve moneth. Bore noe Office. Warwickshire man, served in Lieutenant Generall Cromwell’s Troupe. Hee heard it read and subscribed it. Severall t[imes?] read, cannot recollect the names of those persons that read it.

Demanded his opinion touching a Clause in the letter concerninge some that had tasted of soveraigne ie and had degenerated into Tyrants.

Answered that

As it was the joynt Act of the Eight Regiments to contrive it, they will joyntly answer it.

That hee shall give in his answer with the rest as it was the joynt act of the rest with him.

Hee did not saye, that it was read in any of the Regiments or Troupes when they were brought to a Rendezvous, but that it was read in many places which hee cannot recollect.

Mr. Allen againe.

Neere a twelve moneth since hee came to this Army.

In the Lord General Essex’s Army served under Collonel Holles in his Regiment till hee was a prisoner at Brentford and served afterwards in Gen. Major Skippon’s Regiment.

A prisoner in the Kinges Armie seaven dayes, condemned among seaventene others to bee hanged, by judgment of a Councell of Warre, then every tenth man drawen out to bee hanged, at last an oath putt to them and dismissed. Wounded at first Newberry fight. Tooke the oath at Oatlands.

After hee had taken the Oath hee listed himselfe in Major Generall Skippon’s Regiment, served under Captain Beton.

A felt maker by trade in Southw. Wounded againe at Henly, where hee received five shillings of Major Generall Skippon.

Mr. Sixby.

Suffolk man, trouper in the Generall’s owne troupe, serv’d fower yeares, before hee serv’d the Generall hee serv’d the Lieutenant Generall in that troupe which is now the Generall’s.

Ask’t what hee mean[t] thaire?

Being the generall act of all hee can give noe answer being but one particular man.

Mr. Tho. Shepherd. Shropshire.

Served first under the Earl of Essex in the Earl of Bedford’s Troupe of Cuirasseers.

Taken prisoner at Oxington coming from the relief of Gloucester. Prisoner 5 weekes, tooke noe oath, not exchanged, made his escape. Hee did heare it read, did subscribe it. Cannot remember whether hee read itt himselfe, about a weeke since hee heard it first read. Where? One of the Eight Regiments.

At what place. Hee does not remember. Demanded clause.

If it pleased this Honourable House to putt the Queries in writing the Eight Regiments whereof I am a Member whose joynt act it was will give an answer to them.

Endorsed:

Answers.

Sexby.

Allen.

Shepherd.

30 April, 1647.

[The question whether William Allen, the agitator, mentioned here was the William Allen who subsequently became Adjutant-General of the Horse in the Irish Army is a question of some interest. Ludlow, describing the presentation of the letter by the three troopers, affirms that Allen “was afterwards known by the addition of Adjutant-general” (ed. 1751, p. 73). Carlyle asserts that this is a blunder of Ludlow’s. (1.) On the other hand this question of identity is a point on which Ludlow was likely to be right. He knew Allen personally, and they served together in Ireland (Memoirs, p. 145). Allen belonged to the political party which regarded Ludlow as their leader, and is described as specially commending him (Thurloe, iii. 140, 143). (2.) Allen, the agitator, states that he had served in the Parliamentary army since 1642. Allen, the adjutant-general, writing in 1655 talks of his thirteen years faithful service (Thurloe, iii., 140). (3.) Adjutant-General Allen in his tract published in 1659 (entitled, “A faithful Memorial of that remarkable meeting of many officers of the Army in England at Windsor Castle in the year 1648,” Somers Tracts, vi., 499), speaks as if he had been present at the army councils in 1647, and directly affirms his presence at those in the spring of 1648. At the meetings described in this volume there seem to have been only two Allens present, viz. Captain Allen and Mr. Allen. Captain Allen was Francis Allen of Ingoldsby’s regiment, Mr. Allen, William Allen, the trooper of Cromwell’s own regiment. I believe the agitators were present at the meetings at Windsor in the spring of 1648, and if so William Allen was pretty certainly there. It may be objected that a man who was an ordinary trooper in 1647, would hardly have become adjutant-general in 1651. But the office of adjutant-general did not imply high regimental rank, and when Allen was first mentioned as adjutant-general of horse he was merely a captain. In 1647 and 1648 several privates, who had been agitators, obtained commissions, including Allen’s companion Sexby. Allen’s rise was not as rapid as that of Sexby, who was a lieutenant-colonel in 1651, but there is no improbability in the supposition that the former obtained a commission in 1648.

Of Adjutant-General Allen’s later career more can be stated with certainty. He is spoken of as “Captain Allen, adjutant general of the Horse” in Ireland in September, 1651, and was later one of the commissioners for the settlement of Ulster (Mercurius Politicus, p. 2523). He disapproved of Cromwell’s assumption of the Protectorate, but wrote of the Protector himself: “As to the person in chief place, I confess I love and honour him, for the honour God hath put upon him, and I trust will yet continue, I mean that of uprightheartedness to the Lord, though this last change with his atendencyes hath more stumbled me than ever any did” (Thurloe, ii., 214, 215). Allen was arrested in Devonshire in January, 1655, for “multiplying dissatisfaction in the minds of men to the present government” (Carlyle’s Cromwell, Letter cxcvii.). Thurloe’s papers contain an interesting account of the charges against Allen, and a letter from Allen to the Protector vindicating himself. “I can say truly,” he wrote, “if I have erred it hath been, I fear, in esteeming too highly of you.” He denied any intention of acting against the Protector: “I durst not lift a hand against you nor join with or advise the doing of it” (Thurloe, iii., 141). Allen was allowed to return to his post in Ireland, where he gave Henry Cromwell some trouble, and at length, in November, 1647, resigned his commission (Thurloe, iv., 328, 433; v. 670). In 1659 the Rump nominated him to be colonel of a regiment of horse in Ireland. In addition to the “Faithful Memorial” published in 1659 he printed “A word to the Army touching their sin and duty, 1660.” On April 13, 1660, Allen was arrested “for endeavouring to debauch some of the soldiers from their duty” (Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1657-1660, p. 573). On June 19, 1661, he was ordered to be released from the Gatehouse on giving security for £1,000 that he would leave the kingdom within fifteen days (Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1661-1662, p. 12). I can find no later mention of him.]

APPENDIX C.

A letter of Col. Richard Grevis to Sir Philip Stapleton.

[Though the name of Richard Graves, Greaves, or Grevis does not appear in the original list of the army under Essex, he served as colonel in his army from the winter after Edgehill (Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1644-5, p. 464). He distinguished himself at the second battle of Newbury. In May, 1645, he commanded the cavalry in the detachment of the New Model sent by Fairfax to relieve Taunton (ibid. pp. 76, 488). On April 8, 1647, the House of Commons voted that his regiment should be one of those to be kept up (Rushworth, vi. 452). He belonged later to the Presbyterian section of the royalist party, and when Charles II. was in Scotland was one of the gentlemen of his bedchamber (Clarendon State Papers, ii., 491; Carte, Original Letters, ii., 29). Taken prisoner at the battle of Worcester he was for sometime a prisoner in the Tower, but released on bail during 1652 (Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1651, pp. 422, 430; 1651-2, pp. 32, 114, 229).

The following letter written from Holmby a day or two before Joyce seized the King shows the state of feeling amongst the soldiers under the command of Greaves, who formed the King’s guard.]

Colonel Greaves to Sir Philip Stapleton.

Most honoured Sir,

I thought it necessarye to give you notice of the removal of mine and Sir Robert Pye’s regiments by a late order, of which I have sent you a coppy in the margent, by which it appeareth it is thought they have been too long under my command hereabout and that by quartering them the nearer to the armye they may the better be wrought up to the now humour of it. I cannot indeed commend the greater number of them as they are at this present, but that they have been too readily infected with the taynt of disorder, meerly by that powerful persuasion that they shall obtayne the more money for it. Some there are I am certayne and not a few who will not forsake or disobey the Parliament upon any conditions. I pray God direct and counsell the Parliament to such a speedy course that they and all honest men may be drawne from such as have other villainous and destructive designes: in this I should account it my meat and drink to be instrumentall, and to be further actually serviceable in these commands; and particularly as I am abundantly obliged to appeare more and more

Your constantly faithfull & obedient servant,

Rich. Grevis.

I beseech you present me in my real honouring of Mr. Hollis and Sir Will Lewes.1

The order enclosed runs as follows:—

Sir,

By order for the Generall upon the advice of a Generall Councell of Warre you are forthwith to march with the regiment (saving that part of it which is assigned for the guardes about Holdenbye) to quarter in Papworth hundred in the Countye of Cambrige and immediately upon receipt hereof you are to send two men of the regiment to the head quarters at Bury in Suffolke for further orders by whome you are to give mee notice what time the regiment is like to come to the said quarters.

Your humble servant,

H. Ireton.

For Major Scroope or the chief officer present with Coll. Grevis his regiment of horse.

[This order, or rather this copy of the order, is undated. A similar order of Quartermaster-General Gravener for moving a foot regiment is dated 30 May, and this must be of the same date (Tanner MSS., lviii., p. 121). This fixes the date of the first letter, which is also undated.]

APPENDIX D.

A list of the Agitators elected in 1647.

[The following list is based on a loose paper amongst the Clarke MSS. The paper has unfortunately suffered greatly from damp, and is in some parts very difficult to read. I have supplemented it from the list of names appended to the printed declarations of the agitators, and added where possible the Christian names of the persons mentioned. These additions are marked by brackets. This paper is headed: “A list of the Names of the [two] Commission Officers and two Soldiers of every regiment in the army intrusted for the several regiments according to the Engagement of the Army.” It is dated October, 1647.

Of the Foot Regiments.
The two Officers.The two Soldiers.
1 Skippon’s regiment was quartered at Newcastle, and seems to have been represented solely by Major John Cobbet, v., p. 407.
2 Should be Stephen Shipman.
3 See pp. 32, 173, 180, 187, 280, 330, 339. In 1859 John Clarke was Colonel of a foot regiment in Ireland.
4 “Blewin” should perhaps be “Blethen,” as the name stands in another list.
5 Captain, afterwards Major Holmes, was implicated in the Rye House plot, and executed in 1685 for his share in Monmouth’s rising.
6 Cousin of Richard Deane, the admiral.
1 Edmund Garner appears as a Lieutenant in Hewson’s regiment in November, 1647.
2 Lieutenant-Colonel Brayfield was cashiered by Henry Cromwell in Ireland in 1657 for sedition. Thurloe, vi., 505, 527, 549, 552, 563, 599; Ludlow, Memoirs, ed. 1751, p. 198.
3 This was originally Colonel Fortescue’s regiment; the greater part of it had volunteered for Ireland, hence, probably, its imperfect representation.
4 Lieutenant-Colonel Lagoe was appointed Adjutant-General of the Irish Army in 1659.
5 Lieutenant-Colonel John Mason presented the protest of the officers against kingship in 1657, (Ludlow, p. 224). Governor of Jersey in 1659. Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1658-9, p. 375.
6 Prentice became an ensign in this regiment in November, 1647.
7 Nicholas Cowley, or Cowling, see the book of Army Declarations, p. 71. Cowling is officially described as “Commissary-General of Victuals,” and Robinson as “Commissary of the Draught-Horse. Peacock, Army Lists, pp. 101, 106.
8 The principal instigator of the mutiny of Ingoldsby’s regiment at Oxford in September, 1649. See The Moderate, September 11-18, 1649; and a paper in Proceedings of the Oxford Architectural and Historical Society, 1884.
Of the Generall’s regiment.Major [Francis] White.[Edmund] Vaughan.
Capt. Lewis Audley.— Wilkinson.
Major Generall’s regiment.1
Col. Rainborowe.Capt. Flower.Joseph Adams.
Lieut Shipley.2Robert Gladman.
Sir H. Waller.Capt. [John] Clarke.3Robert Mason.
Capt. [Richard] Hodden.Henry Anderton.
Col. Lambert.Capt. [Matthew] Cadwell.Rich. Colborne.
Capt. Blewin.4John Miller.
Col. Hammond.Capt. [Edmund] Rolfe.Nath. Foxgill.
Capt. Wheeler.Morgan Clarke.
Col. Lilburne.Capt. [Abraham] Holmes.5Jacob Somers.
Capt. [Richard] Deane.6Robert Linsey.
Col. Hughson.Capt. [John] Carter.Edmund Garne.1
Capt. [Alexander] Brayfield.2Richard Nixon.
Col. Barkstead.3Capt. Young.
Col. Pride.Capt. [Waldine] Lagoe.4Nic. Andrewes?
Capt [John] Mason.5Ralph Prentice.6
Col. Overton.Capt. [William] Knolles.Rich. Flower.
Capt. [Edward] Orpin.Stephen Combe.
The Traine.Commissary Cowling.7
[Commissary Thomas] Robinson.Tho. Mills.
Col. Ingoldesby.Capt. [Francis] Allen.Rich. Johnson
Lt [Consolation] Fox.John Radman.8
Regiments of Horse.
The two Officers.The two Soldiers.
5 Horton died in Ireland, in October, 1649. “He was a person of great integrity and courage,” writes Cromwell, Letter cxii. On his services in 1648, see Phillips Civil War in Wales.
4 Sometimes spelt Gethings. He was sentenced to death in February, 1648, for causing a mutiny in this regiment, but the sentence appears to have been remitted.
3 Recommended as Colonel of a regiment of horse in Ireland. Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1659-60, p. 13.
2 Recommended as Colonel of the regiment late Henry Cromwell’s in 1659. Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1659-60, p. 13.
1 In letter clxii. in Carlyle’s Cromwell, Oliver rebukes Colonel Hacker for styling Empson a better preacher than fighter. “He is a good man and a good officer,” says Cromwell, “I would we had no worse.” Earlier in the campaign in Scotland Empson had distinguished himself by rescuing Lambert when the latter was taken prisoner. Ibid., letter cxxxv.
8 On Colonel Francis Thornhaugh, see the Life of Colonel Hutchinson. Thornhaugh was killed at Preston in 1648. This was a Nottingham regiment, and not one of the new-model regiments. Rushworth, vi., 623.
7 See Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1659-60, pp. 299, 591.
6 Late Colonel Rossiter’s regiment, Lords’ Journals, ix., 217.
5 Bridge was knighted at the Restoration, having adhered to Monck and taken part in the seizure of Dublin Castle (Ludlow, Memoirs, ed. 1751, pp. 298, 307). He had succeeded to the command of Okey’s regiment in January, 1655, when Okey was cashiered.
4 On Merriman, see Rushworth, vii., 1051, 1361.
3 Probably the Captain Rawlins recommended in Cromwell’s letter of 4 June, 1645. See Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1659-60, 12, 183, 189, 189, 198; also 1644-5, p. 53.
2 Matthew Thomlinson, knighted by Henry Cromwell, sat as one of the king’s judges, but did not not sign the warrant, escaped at the restoration. See his petition 7th Report of Hist. MSS. Comm., p. 123.
1 A life of Scroope is in Noble’s Lives of the Regicides, 1798. He was executed October 17, 1660.
The Generall’s Regiment.Lt. Empson.1Edw. Sexby.
Cornet [Peter] Wallis.2John Taylor.
Lt. General.Capt. [Joseph] Wallington.Will. Alleyne.
Lt. [Edward] Scotton.Sam. Whiting.
Rich. Kingdon.
Comm. General.Capt. [Henry] Pretty.3John Wood.
Capt. [Robert] Kirkby.Tho. Shepheard.
Col. Fleetwood.Capt. Lloyd.Will. Somes.
Capt.Edw. Twigge.
Col. Harrison.Major [William] Rainborowe.Hen. Gittings.4
Capt. Pecke.Rich. Graunte.
Col. Whalley.Capt. [Henry] Cannon.Timothy Thornborough.
Lieut. [Edmund] Chillenden.Will. Younge.
Col. Horton.5Lieut. [Thomas] Ellis.Tobiah Box.
Cornet [John] Phelpes.John Willoughby.
Col. Scroope.1Capt. Wolfe.Rich [Salter].
Capt. Watson.George [Stenson].
Col. Thomlinson.2Capt. Johnson.Barth. Willocke.
Capt. [Thomas] Rawlins.3Rich. Clarke.
Col. Rich.Capt. [John] Merriman.4Nich. Lockier.
Capt. [William] Weare.Tho. Buttery.
Col. Okey.Major [Daniel] Abbott.Will. Hall.
Capt. [Tobias] Bridge.5Will. Underwood.
The Life GuardCapt. Michell.
Col. Twistleton.6Lt. Izod.7John Wilson.
Lt. Sheirman.John Wells.
Col. Thornhaugh.8Capt. [George] Palmer.John Harte.
Capt. [Richard] Creed.Richard Farre.

APPENDIX E.

Proceedings in the Council of the Army between Nov. 3 and Nov. 8, 1647.

Of the meetings which took place between Wednesday, Nov. 3, and Monday, Nov. 8, the Clarke papers unfortunately contain no record. Of Nov. 4 Rushworth says, “This day the council of the Army again sat at Putney and they considered of some alterations to be desired in the propositions of peace to be sent to his Majesty.” The special work of the day seems to have been considering the propositions dealing with delinquents in relation to the late war (Rushworth, vii., 863). Of the debates of Friday, Nov. 5, and Saturday, Nov. 6, he simply observes, “The general council of the Army sat this day at Putney, and the general with them, and had much debate of the Heads of the Proposalls before mentioned. They sat also again about the same on Saturday, but have not yet finished them” (ibid., 864). Fairfax, who had been ill and was mentioned as absent on October 28, seems to have first returned to his place on Nov. 5. It is probable that Cromwell was absent attending to his duties in parliament. On Nov. 5 the Commons discussed the propositions to be sent to the King, which were that day reported to it from a committee of the two Houses appointed to give them their final form. A circular letter from the Agitators to their regiments says, “Our friends obtained a generall Randezvous, and a Letter from the Councell to clear the Armie from any desire or intent of constraining the Parliament to send Propositions to the King.”

A Copy of a Letter sent by the Agents of severall Regiments of his Excellencie’s Army (that are resolved to the last drop of their blood to stand for the Liberties and Freedoms of the people of England) to all the Souldiers in the said Armie.

The letter is referred to in the Commons’ Journals, Nov. 6, 1647, but not given there or in the Lords’ Journals. It ran thus:

Mr. Speaker,

Whereas it is generally reported that the House was enduced to make another addresse to the King, by Propositions, by reason it was represented to the House as the desire of the Army, From a tendernesse to the priviledges of parliamentary actings, this night the Generall Councell of the Army declared, that any such representation of their desires was together groundlesse; and that they earnestly desire no such consideration may be admitted into the House’s resolutions in that particular.

Signed by the appointment of the Generall Councell of the Army.

William Clerke,

Secretary.

A newsletter in the Clarendon Papers, dated Nov. , says: “Colonel Rainborough, at a council of war held at the headquarters, intimated that the army was not disposed to make any more addresses to the King, which produced the letter to the Speaker, now in print, to that effect, signed by William Clarke, dated the 5th of November from Putney. Ireton opposed the same all he could, and in testimony of his dissent left the council, protesting he could come no more there to be partaker of the high neglect and violation of reason and justice which he observed to reign amongst them. He hath been moved since to return, but continues resolute.” (Clarendon State Papers II., Appendix xli.)

The letter of the Agitators does not expressly mention Ireton’s presence at the debate of Nov. 5 and seems to place his withdrawal on Nov. 6. Speaking of the meeting on Monday, Nov. 8, they say “the day before Commissary Generall Ireton withdrew and protested he would act no more with them unless they recalled the letter.”

Of the debates of Saturday, November 6, and Monday, November 8, the Agitators say:—

At the next meeting a Declaration was offered to the Councell, wherein the Kings corrupt interest was so intermixed, that in a short time, if he should so come in, he would be in a capacitie to destroy you, and the people. Upon this wee desired onely a free debate of this Question; Whether it were safe, either for the Armie, or the people, to suffer any power to be given to the King: and Lievtenant Generall Crumwell, and the rest, professed as before God, they would freely debate it; and munday last, a Generall Councell was appointed for that purpose; but when they met they wholly refused, and in stead of that spake very reproachfully of us and our Actions, and declared against that which was past the Councell before Concerning the voyces of those in Election, which have not fortie shillings by the yeare free-hold, and against the Letter sent by the Councell to the Parliament, and to prevent any further debate, they would have dissolved the Councell for above a fortnight; and thus our hopes of agreeing together to settle your and the peoples freedoms were then frustated, and though the chìefe of them had desired some of our friends, not above three dayes before, to goe on in their actings, for they might come in when they should doe us more service then at that time, yet then they made great outcries against us, and complaints of distempers in the Armie, which were nothing but endeavours after their rights and freedoms.

end of vol. i.

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CAMDEN SOCIETY,

READ AT THE GENERAL MEETING ON THE 2nd MAY, 1891.

The Council of the Camden Society elected on May 2, 1890, regret the loss by death of the following members:—

  • William Aldam, Esq.
  • John Birkbeck, Esq.
  • Sir William R. Drake, Bart.
  • Cyril D. Fortescue, Esq.
  • W. B. Glasse, Esq., Q.C.
  • O. de Beauvoir Priaulx, Esq.
  • James Rae, Esq.
  • J. Anderson Rose, Esq.
  • Henry Ross, Esq.

They also have to report the following accessions to the Society:—

  • The Duke of Northumberland, K.G.
  • John Birkbeck, Esq.
  • J. Hyde, Esq.
  • Leslie Knights Smith, Esq.
  • Sydney University Library.

The books for the year 1890-91 have been—

1. Visitations and Memorials of Southwell Minster. Edited by A. F. Leach, Esq., late Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford; Assistant Charity Commissioner.

2. The Clarke Papers. Vol. I. Edited by C. H. Firth, Esq., M.A.

In the coming year the Council propose to issue—

1. The Nicholas Papers. Vol. II. To be edited by G. F. Warner, Esq., M.A.

2. The Accounts of the Offices of the Monastery of Abingdon. To be edited by R. E. G. Kirk, Esq.

The first of these will throw light on the efforts of the Royalists to regain power during the Commonwealth and Protectorate. The second will add to our knowledge of Medieval economy.

The volume of the Accounts of Henry, Earl of Derby, which was to have been issued this year, has been unavoidably postponed, but the Council hope to be able to include it in the issue for 1892-3.

The Council wish specially to call the attention of Secretaries and other Officers of Libraries and Institutions which are members of the Camden Society to the proposed new law which authorises such Institutions to name a representative who shall be capable of being elected to sit in the Council. The members of the present Council are most anxious to strengthen their position in the manner thus indicated.

Samuel Rawson Gardiner,Director.

James Gairdner,Secretary.

BALANCE SHEET 1890-91.

We, the Auditors appointed to audit the Accounts of the Camden Society, report to the Society, that the Treasurer has exhibited to us an Account of the Receipts and Expenditure from the 1st of April 1890 to the 31st of March 1891, and that we have examined the said accounts, with the vouchers relating thereto, and find the same to be correct and satisfactory.

And we further report that the following is an Abstract of the Receipts and Expenditure during the period we have mentioned:—

RECEIPTS.£s.d.Expenditure.£s.d.
To Balance of last year’s account64911Paid for printing 500 Copies.—
Received on account of Members whose Subscriptions were in arrear at last Audit6300Southwell Visitations20291
Paid for Miscellaneous Printing9190
The like on account of Subscriptions due on the 1st of May, 189012410Paid for delivery and transmission of Books, with paper for wrappers, warehousing expenses, &c (including Insurance)19146
The like on account of Subscriptions due on the 1st of May, 18912010Paid for Paper50128
Paid for Binding3539
One year’s dividend on £466 3 1 2¾ per Cent. Consols, standing in the names of the Trustees of the Society, deducting Income Tax12100Paid for Transcripts1613
Postages, &c.2160
Clerical Assistance660
To Sale of Publications of past years10111
£34323
By Balance11109
£354130£354130

Guy Pym.

John W. Hales.

[a ]This was probably addressed to Lord Fairfax.

[1 ]Carte, Collection of Original Letters and Papers concerning the Affairs of England from 1641 to 1660, 2 vols., 1739; vol. i., pp. 142.

[1 ]Contracted for “particularly.”

[1 ]Something omitted.

[1 ]Tanner MSS., Bodleian Library, vol. lviii., f. 141.