Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAPTER IX.: ENGLISH LAW SCALE OF TRUSTWORTHINESS. - The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 6

Return to Title Page for The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 6

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Subject Area: Law

CHAPTER IX.: ENGLISH LAW SCALE OF TRUSTWORTHINESS. - Jeremy Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 6 [1843]

Edition used:

The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1838-1843). 11 vols. Vol. 6.

Part of: The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAPTER IX.

ENGLISH LAW SCALE OF TRUSTWORTHINESS.

English lawyers on their parts have their scale of trustworthiness in evidence. It consists of two degrees:—the best evidence, and whatever is not the best. For they speak of the best evidence: and in the form of a rule they have a proposition, of which the best evidence is the subject:—“You must give the best evidence that the nature of the thing is capable of.”* By this description, all evidence but regular evidence extracted in the best mode, in a case where preappointed evidence is out of the question, would be excluded:—all testimony but regular testimony extracted in the mode of jury trial—all makeshift evidence at any rate, not to speak of circumstantial evidence, or any other evidence exhibited by affidavit, or in the way of equity justice.

This description being plainly incompetent, and perceived to be so, the expression has been interpreted by another; that is, translated into a different one:—“You must not exhibit any evidence that supposes evidence of a better sort in your own power.”

One example, and one only, is given by Buller, of the application of this rule: and previously to the giving of this example, the rule itself is taken in hand, and explained in such sort as to be nearly explained away and modified in such a manner as to convey a meaning altogether different from that which, without the explanation, it would have brought to view:—“The true meaning of this rule,” he says, “is, that no such evidence shall be brought, that ex naturâ rei supposes a still greater evidence behind, or in the party’s possession or power.” As to the example, it is that of a man’s offering a copy of a deed or will, where he ought to produce the original:—and the case in which he ought to produce it is immediately explained to be any case except where he “proves the original deed or will to be in the hands of the adverse party, or to be destroyed without his default.”

To judge of this rule by this example (and no other example is given of it, or referred to by it,) it amounts to neither more nor less than this—viz. that in written evidence, and in particular in written preappointed evidence, an original is preferable to a transcript: and of these two articles, and these alone, is the scale of trustworthiness of evidence, as given by Judge Buller, composed, with the work of Chief-Baron Gilbert for his oracle and his theme. And such is the produce of the wisdom accumulated during so many centuries, ending with the present time, by the didactic writers on this subject!

APPENDIX B.

OF IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT.

[* ]Buller, pp. 225, 277. Gilbert, pp. 6, 7, 41, 84, 85.