Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow CHAPTER XI.: MORAL ADVANTAGES. - The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 3

Return to Title Page for The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 3

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Subject Area: Economics
Subject Area: Political Theory
Subject Area: Law

CHAPTER XI.: MORAL ADVANTAGES. - Jeremy Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 3 [1843]

Edition used:

The Works of Jeremy Bentham, published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1838-1843). 11 vols. Vol. 3.

Part of: The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols.

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


CHAPTER XI.

MORAL ADVANTAGES.

To the head of moral advantages may be referred two very distinct results:—prevention of improbity, and promotion of frugality: prevention of improbity, by furnishing (as we shall see) a new means or instrument of prevention; promotion of frugality, by the offer of a new species of property, which, by annexing an unprecedented remuneration to the exercise of that virtue, operates at once as an incentive and as a means.

I. As to prevention of improbity. The class of persons in whose instance it may operate to this effect, consists of trustees of every description, to whom it belongs to receive money on account of their principals—executors and administrators, guardians, stewards and receivers, assignees of bankrupts, prize-agents, factors, and the like.

To cause trust-monies, as often as a suitable case presents itself, to be laid out in the purchase of government annuities for the benefit of the principals, is, in the court of Chancery, matter of long-established practice—a practice which, by an act of very recent date, has received express support from parliament. The credit of the proposed new government annuities having been previously established by sufficient experience, let a similar investment of all trust-monies, as they come in, be rendered a matter of general obligation by an act of the legislature. A trust-receipt book to be kept with a trust-till. In the book, an entry to be made of each sum received, with the day on which it was received; the statement of the day to be indispensable. The money, if not received in the shape of annuity notes, to be sent to the office on that day or the next, to be changed into annuity notes; the notes received to be entered by their numbers; if the day be not entered, the first day of the year to be presumed, for the purpose of charging the trustee with the interest. The trust-paper, as received, to be deposited in the trust-till, to save it from being confounded with money of his own. This not to prevent the disposal of the amount to superior advantage (i. e. at a higher rate of interest than what is afforded by annuity notes) in as far as the nature of the trust admits of it.

What is thus proposed to be rendered obligatory for the benefit of the principal, is no more than what a careful trustee would do spontaneously, either for the benefit of the principal or for his own, according to the texture of his conscience. Should a precaution thus simple and unexceptionable be neglected, the institution of annuity notes will be but too apt to operate as a premium for vice as well as virtue—a premium for improbity in the one situation, as well as for frugality in the other.

II. Lastly, as to promotion of frugality. We have seen the peculiar advantages which the proposed new species of property holds out to the acquirer. Within a trifling and unavoidable fraction, 2d. a-day: £3 for every £100 by the year—not for risk of lending, but for mere self-denial in not spending. Income, receivable without expense, and without stirring from his home. No attendance, no agency fees, no brokerage fees, no stamp-duty, either on purchase or on sale. No loss, on either occasion, by fluctuation of price. Not a day without its profit—profit by keeping, for the minutest as well as for the largest portions of time: conveyance obtainable for it by the post in the minutest portions as well as to the most distant parts of the island. Security afforded by division against misadventures of all sorts—against accidents and against crimes—in the house or on the road—by fire, water, or forgetfulness—from theft, robbery, burglary, or breach of trust. Compound interest brought within the reach of individuals for the first time.

In proportion to the degree in which it presents these several accommodations, in that same proportion does it act as an incentive to frugality:—in all classes in a certain degree, and in as far as current expenditure is concerned; but in a more especial degree, in those humble, and at the same time most numerous walks of life, in which it is of most importance to prudence, probity, and happiness.*

In the existing state of the money-market, the hoards of the opulent are prolific and accumulating: the hoards of the poor alone are dead and unproductive. By the proposed measure, the condition of the poor in this respect would be raised to a level—in the first instance not much below, and in process of time (as the price of stock annuities rose, and the rate of interest obtainable by the purchase of them diminished) altogether upon a par with, the condition of the rich.

A result not to be viewed without regret is, that in every period after the second, and in proportion as the rate of interest afforded by government annuities comes to be reduced, the encouragement thus given to frugality will thus be reduced likewise: for though, after the reduction, the remainder will be gain, as compared with the present period, yet the difference will be loss, in comparison of the period then last in experience. But in the meantime, the condition of the poor in this respect will, at any rate, have been raised to a level with that of the rich, and will so continue. The habit of frugality will have taken root, and having so done, may derive strength, rather than weakness, from the increased exertions it will be called upon to make.

[]Since the above was written, a passage has been discovered in Pinto, whereby it appears that at the date of his book (1771) a law to this effect existed in Holland, in respect of the interest-bearing paper of that country, termed obligations. [De la Circulation, et du Crédit, p. 81.] There is a great deal of good and a great deal of evil (he says) in the effects of this law: but the good appears to consist in the mode of employing the money as above—the evil, in the hands in which the management is reposed, or in some other such collateral circumstance as the forced sale of property, in whatever other shape it may be in, besides money, for the purpose of converting it into this.

[* ]Frugality, itself a virtue, is an auxiliary to all the other virtues: to none more than to generosity, to which, by the unthinking, it is so apt to be regarded as an adversary. The sacrifice of the present to the future, is the common basis of all the virtues: frugality is among the most difficult and persevering exemplifications of that sacrifice. Important in all classes, it is more particularly so in those which abound in uncultivated minds. In these, to promote frugality is to promote sobriety: to curb that raging vice which in peaceful times outstrips all other moral causes of unhappiness put together. In the prospects opened by frugality, the wife and children have a principal share: they derive nothing but vexation and distress from the money spent at the gin-shop or the ale-house. Compared with the prodigal, the hardest of misers is a man of virtue.

In the “Outline of a plan of provision for the poor,” as printed in Young’s Annals of Agriculture,a among the collateral uses there mentioned as derivable from the system of industry-houses there proposed, is that of their affording, each of them to its neighbourhood, a bank, for the reception and improvement of the produce of frugality on a small scale, under the name of a frugality bank. In the plan that was handed about of the then proposed Globe Insurance Company, since established by act of Parliament, among the uses mentioned as proposed to be made of the stock of such company, is that of carrying on the business of such a frugality bank, with a reference to the suggestions given in the above papers.

Were the proposed annuity-note paper to be emitted, “Every poor man might be his own banker:” every poor man might, by throwing his little hoards into this shape, make banker’s profit of his own money. Every country cottage—every little town tenement—might, with this degree of profit, and with a degree of security till now unknown, be a frugality bank.

[* ]Frugality, itself a virtue, is an auxiliary to all the other virtues: to none more than to generosity, to which, by the unthinking, it is so apt to be regarded as an adversary. The sacrifice of the present to the future, is the common basis of all the virtues: frugality is among the most difficult and persevering exemplifications of that sacrifice. Important in all classes, it is more particularly so in those which abound in uncultivated minds. In these, to promote frugality is to promote sobriety: to curb that raging vice which in peaceful times outstrips all other moral causes of unhappiness put together. In the prospects opened by frugality, the wife and children have a principal share: they derive nothing but vexation and distress from the money spent at the gin-shop or the ale-house. Compared with the prodigal, the hardest of misers is a man of virtue.

In the “Outline of a plan of provision for the poor,” as printed in Young’s Annals of Agriculture,a among the collateral uses there mentioned as derivable from the system of industry-houses there proposed, is that of their affording, each of them to its neighbourhood, a bank, for the reception and improvement of the produce of frugality on a small scale, under the name of a frugality bank. In the plan that was handed about of the then proposed Globe Insurance Company, since established by act of Parliament, among the uses mentioned as proposed to be made of the stock of such company, is that of carrying on the business of such a frugality bank, with a reference to the suggestions given in the above papers.

Were the proposed annuity-note paper to be emitted, “Every poor man might be his own banker:” every poor man might, by throwing his little hoards into this shape, make banker’s profit of his own money. Every country cottage—every little town tenement—might, with this degree of profit, and with a degree of security till now unknown, be a frugality bank.

[a]See that work as reprinted in the present collection.