|
|
Front Page Titles (by Subject) VII.: Conclusions - The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 10 (The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy)
VII.: Conclusions - Geoffrey Brennan, The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 10 (The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy) [1985]Edition used:The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 10 (The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy) Foreword by Robert D. Tollison (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1999).
About Liberty Fund:Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright information:Foreword and coauthor note © 2000 Liberty Fund, Inc. © 1985 by Cambridge University Press.
Fair use statement:
This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
- Foreword
- Preface
- The Reason of Rules
- 1.: The Constitutional Imperative
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Reasons For Rules
- III.: Rules of Games
- IV.: Rules of the Road
- V.: Rules of the Market Order
- VI.: Rules of Political Order
- VII.: The Importance of Rules
- 2.: The Contractarian Vision
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Noncontractarian Constitutionalism
- III.: Individuals As Sources of Value
- IV.: Contract and Exchange
- V.: Politics In the Exchange Perspective
- VI.: Unanimity As the Contractual Ideal
- VII.: Agreement On Rules and the Veils of Ignorance and Uncertainty
- VIII.: Conclusions
- 3.: The Myth of Benevolence *
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Private Good and Public Good
- III.: Science, Truth, and Politics
- IV.: The Authoritarian Imperative
- V.: Majoritarian Democracy In the Noncontractarian Paradigm
- VI.: The Aim of Politics
- 4.: Modeling the Individual For Constitutional Analysis
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Homo Economicus In Politics: the Argument For Symmetry
- III.: Science and the Empiricist Defense
- IV.: A Methodological Defense of the Differential Interest Model of Behavior
- V.: Social Evaluation and Quasi-risk Aversion
- VI.: Gresham’s Law In Politics
- VII.: Summary
- 5.: Time, Temptation, and the Constrained Future *
- Preface
- Part 1.: Individual Private Choice
- I.: Introduction
- II.: The Ultimate Z ’s
- III.: Preferences For Preferences
- IV.: Past, Present, and Future
- Part 2.: Individual Public Choice
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Society With a History
- III.: Temporal Interdependence
- IV.: An Illustration
- V.: Moral Rules And/or Constitutional Commitment
- 6.: Politics Without Rules, I: Time and Nonconstrained Collective Action
- I.: Introduction
- II.: The Social Discount Rate
- III.: The High-tax Trap
- IV.: The Inflation Trap
- V.: The Public-debt Trap
- VI.: Other Examples
- VII.: Conclusions
- 7.: Rules and Justice
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Just Conduct and the Notion of Desert
- III.: Justice and Promise Keeping
- IV.: Justice Among Rules
- V.: Just Rules, Agreed-on Rules, and Just Conduct
- VI.: Conclusions
- 8.: Politics Without Rules, II: Distributive Justice and Distributive Politics
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Distributive Justice: the Conventional View
- III.: The Constitutional Perspective and Institutional Incidence
- IV.: The Incidence of Unrestricted Majoritarianism
- V.: Tax Rules and Distribution Under Majority Rule
- VI.: Direct Constitutionalism and Distributive Justice
- VII.: Summary
- 9.: Is Constitutional Revolution Possible In Democracy?
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Pareto-superior Change and Wicksellian Unanimity
- III.: Distributional Limits and Prospective Rules
- IV.: Status Quo Entitlements and Distributional Envy
- V.: Constitutional Change and Free Riders
- VI.: The Role of Norms
- VII.: Toward a Civic Religion
VII.
Conclusions
In this chapter, primarily through the use of three applications from macroeconomic policy, we have tried to demonstrate in practical and relevant terms the basic logic of, or reason for, the imposition of binding constraints or rules on the activities of collective units or governments. The theme of the disparity between the rate of time discount applied in public and in private choice, possibly by the same person, has been used to show that the political concentration on temporary or short-term benefits, a concentration that is inherent in the structure of unconstrained majoritarian politics and also in other nonconstrained governmental decision-making procedures, to the relative neglect of long-term considerations, may produce results that are desired by no person or group of persons in the community—hence, the use of the word “trap” or “dilemma.” In short, the results produced by the short-term perspective in modern politics may be “Pareto pessimal.”
7.
Rules and Justice
|