|
|
Front Page Titles (by Subject) VIII.: Conclusions - The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 10 (The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy)
VIII.: Conclusions - Geoffrey Brennan, The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 10 (The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy) [1985]Edition used:The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 10 (The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy) Foreword by Robert D. Tollison (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1999).
About Liberty Fund:Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright information:Foreword and coauthor note © 2000 Liberty Fund, Inc. © 1985 by Cambridge University Press.
Fair use statement:
This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
- Foreword
- Preface
- The Reason of Rules
- 1.: The Constitutional Imperative
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Reasons For Rules
- III.: Rules of Games
- IV.: Rules of the Road
- V.: Rules of the Market Order
- VI.: Rules of Political Order
- VII.: The Importance of Rules
- 2.: The Contractarian Vision
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Noncontractarian Constitutionalism
- III.: Individuals As Sources of Value
- IV.: Contract and Exchange
- V.: Politics In the Exchange Perspective
- VI.: Unanimity As the Contractual Ideal
- VII.: Agreement On Rules and the Veils of Ignorance and Uncertainty
- VIII.: Conclusions
- 3.: The Myth of Benevolence *
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Private Good and Public Good
- III.: Science, Truth, and Politics
- IV.: The Authoritarian Imperative
- V.: Majoritarian Democracy In the Noncontractarian Paradigm
- VI.: The Aim of Politics
- 4.: Modeling the Individual For Constitutional Analysis
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Homo Economicus In Politics: the Argument For Symmetry
- III.: Science and the Empiricist Defense
- IV.: A Methodological Defense of the Differential Interest Model of Behavior
- V.: Social Evaluation and Quasi-risk Aversion
- VI.: Gresham’s Law In Politics
- VII.: Summary
- 5.: Time, Temptation, and the Constrained Future *
- Preface
- Part 1.: Individual Private Choice
- I.: Introduction
- II.: The Ultimate Z ’s
- III.: Preferences For Preferences
- IV.: Past, Present, and Future
- Part 2.: Individual Public Choice
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Society With a History
- III.: Temporal Interdependence
- IV.: An Illustration
- V.: Moral Rules And/or Constitutional Commitment
- 6.: Politics Without Rules, I: Time and Nonconstrained Collective Action
- I.: Introduction
- II.: The Social Discount Rate
- III.: The High-tax Trap
- IV.: The Inflation Trap
- V.: The Public-debt Trap
- VI.: Other Examples
- VII.: Conclusions
- 7.: Rules and Justice
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Just Conduct and the Notion of Desert
- III.: Justice and Promise Keeping
- IV.: Justice Among Rules
- V.: Just Rules, Agreed-on Rules, and Just Conduct
- VI.: Conclusions
- 8.: Politics Without Rules, II: Distributive Justice and Distributive Politics
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Distributive Justice: the Conventional View
- III.: The Constitutional Perspective and Institutional Incidence
- IV.: The Incidence of Unrestricted Majoritarianism
- V.: Tax Rules and Distribution Under Majority Rule
- VI.: Direct Constitutionalism and Distributive Justice
- VII.: Summary
- 9.: Is Constitutional Revolution Possible In Democracy?
- I.: Introduction
- II.: Pareto-superior Change and Wicksellian Unanimity
- III.: Distributional Limits and Prospective Rules
- IV.: Status Quo Entitlements and Distributional Envy
- V.: Constitutional Change and Free Riders
- VI.: The Role of Norms
- VII.: Toward a Civic Religion
VIII.
Conclusions
Much of the discussion in this chapter has summarized material developed in earlier works within what may be called the contractarian strand of modern public-choice theory. We felt it necessary to include the material here in summary form, however, in order to maintain the potential interest of those who may not be familiar with the earlier contributions. Without some feel for the contractarian vision or paradigm from which we start and within which we work, the more narrowly focused, less familiar arguments advanced in succeeding chapters may seem to be free-floating irrelevancies.
One of our continuing frustrations has been the apparent unwillingness of our peers to acknowledge the importance of the several principles that, to us, seem elementary. The problem seems to be one of a difference in vision (paradigm, conception, or research program). In this chapter we have sketched our own vision; in Chapter 3 we shall try to describe and criticize the vision of the anticonstitutionalist.
3.
The Myth of Benevolence
|