Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow Part I.: The Seizure of the Prize in Question Was Honourable - Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty

Return to Title Page for Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty

Search this Title:

Part I.: The Seizure of the Prize in Question Was Honourable - Hugo Grotius, Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty [1603]

Edition used:

Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, ed. and with an Introduction by Martine Julia van Ittersum (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006).

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


Part I.

The Seizure of the Prize in Question Was Honourable

In Part I the following theses are presented:

1.Everything just is honourable.

2. It is especially honourable to take vengeance, in behalf of one’s allies or one’s native land, upon men who are incorrigible.

3. Seizure of spoils may be especially honourable because of the purpose served thereby.