EconlibThe LibraryOther Sites |
Front Page  Titles (by Subject) chapter 4: The Negation of Valuation - Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution (LF ed.)
Return to Title Page for Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution (LF ed.)The Online Library of LibertyA project of Liberty Fund, Inc.Search this Title:Also in the Library:
chapter 4: The Negation of Valuation - Ludwig von Mises, Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution (LF ed.) [1957]Edition used:Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution, ed. Bettina Bien Greaves (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005).
About Liberty Fund:Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. Copyright information:The copyright to this edition, in both print and electronic forms, is held by Liberty Fund, Inc. Fair use statement:This material is put online to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. Unless otherwise stated in the Copyright Information section above, this material may be used freely for educational and academic purposes. It may not be used in any way for profit.
chapter 4The Negation of ValuationIn dealing with judgments of value we have looked upon them as ultimate data not liable to any reduction to other data. We do not contend that judgments of value as they are uttered by men and used as guides to action are primary facts independent of all the other conditions of the universe. Such an assumption would be preposterous. Man is a part of the universe, he is the product of the forces operating in it, and all his thoughts and actions are, like the stars, the atoms, and the animals, elements of nature. They are embedded in the inexorable concatenation of all phenomena and events. Saying that judgments of value are ultimately given facts means that the human mind is unable to trace them back to those facts and happenings with which the natural sciences deal. We do not know why and how definite conditions of the external world arouse in a human mind a definite reaction. We do not know why different people and the same people at various instants of their lives react differently to the same external stimuli. We cannot discover the necessary connection between an external event and the ideas it produces within the human mind. To clarify this issue we must now analyze the doctrines supporting the contrary opinion. We must deal with all varieties of materialism. part 2Determinism and Materialism |
