Econlib

The Library

Other Sites

Front Page arrow Titles (by Subject) arrow II.: Declaration prohibiting the use of asphyxiating or deleterious gases 1 . - The Hague Peace Conferences and Other International Conferences concerning the Laws and Usages of War

Return to Title Page for The Hague Peace Conferences and Other International Conferences concerning the Laws and Usages of War

Search this Title:

Also in the Library:

Collection: Primary Sources
Subject Area: Law
Subject Area: War and Peace
Topic: The Laws of War

II.: Declaration prohibiting the use of asphyxiating or deleterious gases 1 . - A. Pearce Higgins, The Hague Peace Conferences and Other International Conferences concerning the Laws and Usages of War [1909]

Edition used:

The Hague Peace Conferences and Other International Conferences concerning the Laws and Usages of War. Texts of Conventions with Commentaries, by A. Pearce Higgins, LL.D. (Cambridge University Press, 1909).

About Liberty Fund:

Liberty Fund, Inc. is a private, educational foundation established to encourage the study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals.


II.

Declaration prohibiting the use of asphyxiating or deleterious gases1 .

The question of the prohibition of new kinds of explosives was considered by the First Committee of the Conference of 1899, and the Russian delegate expressed the opinion that the use of asphyxiating gases was barbarous and on the same footing as the poisoning of a river. Captain Mahan, the United States naval delegate, opposed this view and gave the following reasons for voting against the prohibition: “(1) That no shell emitting such gases is as yet in practical use or has undergone adequate experiment; consequently, a vote taken now would be taken in ignorance of the facts as to whether the results would be of a decisive character, or whether injury in excess of that necessary to attain the end of warfare, of immediately disabling the enemy, would be inflicted. (2) That the reproach addressed against those supposed shells was equally uttered formerly against firearms and torpedoes, although each is now employed without scruple. Until we know the effects of such asphyxiating shells, there was no saying whether they would be more or less merciful than missiles now permitted. (3) That it was illogical and not demonstrably humane to be tender about asphyxiating men with gas, when all were prepared to admit that it was allowable to blow the bottom out of an ironclad at midnight, throwing four or five hundred men into the sea to be asphyxiated by water, with barely the remotest chance of escape. If, and when, a shell emitting asphyxiating gases has been successfully produced, then and not before, will men be able to vote intelligently on the subject2 .”

The British naval delegate (Admiral Sir John Fisher) supported the prohibition on the understanding that the vote was unanimous. When the question was reconsidered Captain Mahan declined to withdraw his negative vote and Sir Julian Pauncefote voted with him3 .

This Declaration remained unsigned by both Great Britain and the United States until the commencement of the Second Peace Conference, when Sir Edward Fry was instructed to sign it on behalf of the British Government4 , but the United States have not signed. It has been signed by all the other Powers represented at the First Peace Conference but not by those which were represented only at the Second.

Declaration III (1899).

[1 ]De Martens, Recueil Nouveau de Traités (2nd series), Vol. xxvi. p. 998; Parl. Papers, Misc. No. 1 (1899), pp. 81, 181; F. W. Holls, The Peace Conference at the Hague, p. 118.

[2 ]Parl. Papers, Misc. No. 1 (1899), p. 81; F. W. Holls, op. cit. p. 119.

[3 ]Parl. Papers, Misc. No. 1 (1899), pp. 181-2.

[4 ]Parl. Papers, Misc. No. 1 (1907), p. 26; La Deux. Confér. T. i. p. 89.